Highlights What are the main findings? Material sourcing and rammed technology are linked to compressive performance. Aggregate characteristics were incorporated into DEM modeling of rammed earth. Tests and DEM simulations revealed the mesoscopic basis of mechanical behavior. What are the implications of the main findings? The results support mechanical assessment of heritage rammed-earth sites. The aggregate-based DEM model helps interpret strength and failure differences. The findings provide guidance for conservation of rammed-earth Great Wall sites.Highlights What are the main findings? Material sourcing and rammed technology are linked to compressive performance. Aggregate characteristics were incorporated into DEM modeling of rammed earth. Tests and DEM simulations revealed the mesoscopic basis of mechanical behavior. What are the implications of the main findings? The results support mechanical assessment of heritage rammed-earth sites. The aggregate-based DEM model helps interpret strength and failure differences. The findings provide guidance for conservation of rammed-earth Great Wall sites.Abstract Heritage rammed earth is a special soil material formed by manually selecting and ramming locally available Quaternary surface deposits layer by layer. However, the quantitative influence of material sourcing and rammed technology on the compressive properties of heritage rammed earth remains insufficiently understood, which limits the mechanical assessment and conservation planning of rammed earth sites. In this study, undisturbed rammed earth from 15 Ming Great Wall sites in Northwest China was investigated. Field 3D scanning, particle-size analysis, uniaxial compression testing, mesoscopic structural observation, and DEM analysis were combined to evaluate the effects of material characteristics and rammed technology on the compressive properties of heritage rammed earth. The results show clear regional differences in material characteristics and rammed technology parameters across the 15 sites. Across the five occurrence regions from the Extremely Arid Area to the Semi-Humid Area, dry density, silt fraction, curvature coefficient, and ramming pit distribution area ratio generally decreased, whereas clay and colloidal particle fraction, d60, Cu, and rammed modulus generally increased. These variations were accompanied by changes in internal fabric, including aggregate proportion, coordination-number difference, high-stress particle proportion, and force-chain particle proportion. The peak stress and failure strain ranged from 0.48 to 1.01 MPa and from 0.03 to 0.07, respectively. Both parameters showed a decreasing regional trend from the extremely arid area to the semi-humid area, following the sequence: extremely arid area, arid area, semi-arid area, cold and humid area, and semi-humid area. From the Extremely Arid Area to the Semi-Humid Area, the shear failure mode changed from single-fork to mixed double-fork and then to intersecting double-fork. Regression analysis further showed that material and rammed technology parameters were closely related to mesoscopic structural parameters, with R2 values generally greater than 0.75. These findings suggest that the regional differences in compressive behavior were closely associated with variations in material sourcing, rammed technology, internal fabric, and the load-bearing structure of rammed earth.