Dryland watersheds are governed by tightly coupled source-sink dynamics, in which expanding bare soil and declining vegetated patches amplify runoff, sediment transport, and land degradation. Identifying suitable locations for water harvesting structures remains challenging due to the limited scalability of field assessments and the inability of coarse DEM-based GIS methods to capture critical microtopographic features. This study evaluates whether high-resolution (0.44 m) topographic data, integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), can identify suitable locations for water harvesting structures in dryland watersheds and compares the model discrimination of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Fuzzy AHP (FAHP). Eight geomorphic and ecological indicators were evaluated and validated using 565 practitioner-identified restoration practice locations across two watersheds in southern New Mexico. The results show that 78% (East Control) and 94% (West Restoration) of validation sites occur within the top two predicted suitability classes, with moderate to good model discrimination (AUC: 0.671-0.723) and strong ranking performance (Boyce Index: 0.945-0.983). AHP and FAHP produced nearly identical outputs (Delta AUC < 1%; Delta Boyce <= 0.005). These findings demonstrate that high-resolution topography, coupled with MCDA, provides a robust and transferable framework for the landscape-scale prioritization of nature-based water harvesting structures to support ecohydrological restoration in dryland watersheds.