DOI
10.21037/apm.2020.04.26
The efficacy and safety of capecitabine-based versus S-1-based chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical randomized trials
作者地址
The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
通讯作者
Xiaodong He; Kehu Yang
来源期刊
ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
ISSN
2224-5820
EISSN
2224-5839
出版日期
2020-06-18
卷号
9
期号
3
页码
883-894
摘要
Background: Gastric cancer (GC), particularly unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent GC, has been characterized by unfavorable prognosis. This meta-analysis of clinical randomized phase II trials was conducted to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine-based versus S-1-based chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent GC. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies eligible for the present analysis. Data were collected from inception to June 20th, 2019. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR); 6-, 12-, and 18-month progression-free survival (PFS); 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS); and adverse events. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine whether the results of the meta-analysis were robust. Risk ratio (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported as the main evaluation parameters. Results: Six eligible studies with 561 subjects were included in the present meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between S-1-based and capecitabine-based chemotherapy in ORR (RR =1.17, 95% CI: 0.95-1.44, P=0.13, I-2 =0%); 6-month (HR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.77-1.14, I-2 =0%), 12-month (HR =0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.31, I-2 =0%), and 18-month PFS (HR =1.02, 95% CI: 0.55-1.91, I-2 =0%); 1-year (HR =0.99, 95% CI: 0.83-1.18, I-2 =0%), 2-year (HR =0.90, 95% CI: 0.58-1.42, I-2 =0%), and 3-year OS (HR =1.08, 95% CI: 0.50-2.34, I-2 =0%). However, the capecitabine-based chemotherapy had a higher incidence in all grades of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (RR =3.41, 95% CI: 1.98-5.90, P<0.01, I-2 =39%) and grades 3-4 neutropenia (RR =1.62, 95% CI: 1.05-2.51, P=0.03, I-2 =0%). Conclusions: In terms of efficacy, capecitabine-based chemotherapy and S-1-based chemotherapy had similar short-term outcomes. Regarding safety, we recommend S-1-based chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent GC prior to capecitabine-based treatment.
资助信息
Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation Foundation of Gansu Province
资助机构
Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation Foundation of Gansu Province
语种
英语
国家
学科领域
收录类别
SCIE ; SSCI
WOS学科分类
Health Care Sciences & Services
WOS关键词
Author KeywordsCapecitabinemeta-analysisrandomized controlled trials (RCTs)stomach neoplasmsS-1Keywords PlusPHASE-II TRIALHAND-FOOT SYNDROMEADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY1ST-LINE TREATMENTPLUS OXALIPLATINS-1QUALITYASSOCIATIONCOMBINATIONCISPLATIN
被引频次(WOS)
6
研究类型
Meta分析

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。