兰州大学循证社会科学交叉创新实验室 Innovation Laboratory of Evidence-based Social Sciences,Lanzhou University

Various application roles for Campbell systematic reviews: a citation analysis

Yaolong Chen
2024-02-02
Objectives: Systematic reviews (SRs) are becoming essential evidence in the decision-making process within the field of social sci-ences. This study aimed to investigate how Campbell SRs were cited and explore their specific application roles.Study Design and Setting: We included Campbell SRs published between 2016 and 2020 by searching the Wiley online library, and retrieved the articles and documents citing Campbell SRs from the Web of Science and Google Scholar by December 31, 2021. We described the characteristics of the SRs and citations, and formulated a set of application roles by analyzing the sentences or paragraphs where the SRs were cited.Results: Sixty nine Campbell SRs were published between 2016 and 2020; they were cited in 641 articles or documents a total of 1,289 times. The primary types of articles that cited Campbell SRs were cross-sectional studies (n = 226, 35.3%), SRs (n = 112, 17.5%), ran-domized controlled trials (n = 77, 12.0%), and policy reports (n = 57, 8.8%). Articles utilizing Campbell SRs were predominantly led by authors from the United States (n = 184, 28.7%), the United Kingdom (n = 98, 15.3%), and Australia (n = 51, 8.0%). We formulated a set of 10 application roles for the Campbell SRs, of which the most frequent were: describing the current status in the field of interest (n = 691, 53.6%), corroboration of the results (n = 140, 10.9%), identifying research gaps (n = 130, 10.1%), and providing methodological refer-ences (n = 126, 9.8%); the role of supporting policy recommendations or decisions accounted for 6.0% (n = 77) of the citations. Approx-imately 12% of Campbell SRs were used to support policy recommendations or decisions.Conclusion: Campbell SRs are widely applied, particularly in scientific research, to describe the current status in the field of interest. Although the current application of Campbell SRs in supporting policy recommendations and decisions may not be predominant, there is a growing recognition of their value in using Campbell SRs to inform decision-making.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷号:166
ISSN:0895-4356|收录类别:SCIE
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111230
EISSN
1878-5921
出版日期
2024-02-02
关键词
Campbell systematic reviewsPolicy recommendations and decisionsApplication of evidenceApplication rolesDescribe the current status in the field of interestApplication status
资助信息
National Office of Philosophy and Social Sciences
资助机构
全国哲学社会科学工作办公室
相关链接
https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(23)00320-7/abstract
语种
英语
国家
中国
学科领域
循证社会学
WOS学科分类
Health Care Sciences & ServicesPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health
被引频次(WOS)
0
来源机构
Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Social Sci Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
研究类型
方法学