DOI
10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103034
Reporting quality of acupuncture overviews: A methodological investigation based on the PRIOR statement
作者地址
Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
通讯作者
Cuncun Lu
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
ISSN
0965-2299
EISSN
1873-6963
出版日期
2024-03-21
卷号
82
摘要
Objective: Acupuncture overviews are increasing rapidly; however, their reporting quality is yet unclear. We aimed to investigate the reporting quality of relevant overviews according to the preferred reporting items for overviews of reviews (PRIOR) statement. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed from inception to August 16, 2022 for overviews on acupuncture therapies. Reporting quality of included overviews was evaluated using the PRIOR statement, and the results were cross-checked. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the predictors of the reporting completeness. GraphPad 9.4 was utilized to generate an evidence map, Excel 2019 was used to extract and manage data, and R 4.2.3 was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 49 overviews published from 2006 to 2022 were included, of which China ranked first with 38 overviews. The most frequently searched database was PubMed/ Medline (n = 48, 98%), and commonly used methodological quality assessment tool was AMSTAR-2 (n = 14, 29%). The overarching themes centered on acupuncture for obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive diseases, as well as depression, anxiety, and insomnia. Reporting quality needs to be improved involving the definition of systematic reviews (SRs), overlap of primary studies and SRs, methods for managing discrepant data across SRs, risk of bias in primary studies, heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis of synthesized results, reporting bias assessment, and registration and protocol. Moreover, publication in recent years and receiving funding support were significantly associated with higher overall reporting quality score (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on the PRIOR statement, this methodological study indicates that the reporting quality of the included acupuncture overviews is poor. In the future, authors of overviews are encouraged to use the PRIOR statement for standardized reporting. Furthermore, it is recommended that journal editors mandate the inclusion of this statement in authors' reports and require a complete PRIOR checklist.
资助信息
Gansu Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund Program (No. 22JR5RA706) and Gansu Provincial Excellent Doctor Fund Program (No. 22JR5RA649)
资助机构
甘肃省科技厅
语种
英文
国家
学科领域
收录类别
SCIE
WOS学科分类
Integrative & Complementary Medicine
WOS关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
被引频次(WOS)
0
研究类型
系统评价
附件
  • 403 Reporting quality of acupuncture overviews A methodological investigation based on the PRIOR statement.pdf
    2.07 MB

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。