兰州大学循证社会科学交叉创新实验室 Innovation Laboratory of Evidence-based Social Sciences,Lanzhou University

Collaboration between health system decision makers and professional researchers to coproduce knowledge, a scoping review.

2022-01-01

Background:
     
     Recent literature uses different terms and approaches to the collaboration between researchers and health system decision-makers in the research process. In 2012, the World Health Organisation proposed to "Embed research within decision-making processes". Yet, important contributions use other terms and perspectives for the same issue. This scoping review aimed to identify these terms, approaches, their application and eventual influence on the utilization of evidence.
   

Methods:
     
     We searched papers published between January 2000 and February 2019 in English, Spanish, French and Portuguese in the databases of PubMed, Scielo, Google Scholar and EBSCOhost, thus accessing MedicLatina, MEDLINE Complete and eBook Collection. Our main inclusion criterion was the participation of health personnel in non-clinical research activities. We considered three domains for in depth analysis: Definition, name and description of the participation of decision makers and health staff; Forms of collaboration and actual/effective participation of health staff in research; Eventual influence on the utilization of research results.
   

Results:
     
     We identified 607 articles and selected 74 for full text analysis. Nineteen different terms are currently used in twelve countries to describe the participation of health decision-makers and staff in research activities. Most publications refer to Integrated Knowledge Translation or Embedded Research, and were published in Canada and the United Kingdom. Forty-five papers discuss the participation of health staff in research activities; 20 leading the whole process and 21 as collaborators.
   

Conclusions:
     
     The identification of the different terms and approaches to the close collaboration of health staff and decision-makers with professional researchers is essential to promote its effective application and influence on the utilization of evidence. Yet, it is also necessary to insist in their co-participation throughout the whole investigation process as a relevant way to improve research results uptake, strengthen health systems and advance towards universal health coverage.
   

研究类型
系统评价再评价
人群
混合人群
国家
Mexico
关键词
co-production; embedded research; health systems research; integrated knowledge translation; scoping review.
来源期刊
Int J Health Plann Manage
发布日期
2022-01-01
全文链接
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35643849/
相关网址
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35643849/
DOI
10.1002/hpm.3513
主题
["人力资源"] ["卫生服务"]
作者
Pilar Torres-Pereda Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal Víctor Becerril-Montekio Luis Alberto García-Bello Etienne V Langlois Ludovic Reveiz