Health Policy

ISSN:

0168-8510

国家:

United Kingdom

影响因子:

3.6 (2023)

SCIE收录情况:

SCIE , SSCI

JCR分区:

Q1

Lotte Timmermans ; Lotte Timmermans ; Elena Golder ; Peter Decat ; Veerle Foulon ; Ann Van Hecke ; Birgitte Schoenmakers ; on behalf of the Primary Care Academy
2023-09-01 相关链接

摘要

Objective To provide an overview of types and characteristics of self-management support (SMS) interventions in adults with chronic disease and to assess the impact on the patient reported outcome Quality of Life (QoL). Methods An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from January 2016 to November 2020 for reviews on SMS interventions for chronic diseases, assessing the impact on the patient reported outcome QoL. Quality assessment was based on the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic reviews and Research Syntheses tool. Results 28 reviews were included. The extensive literature review revealed a variety of SMS interventions. The most frequently cited target group for the interventions were individuals with diabetes. Interventions primarily took place in the home setting. Interventional components that were often incorporated were education, eHealth and mHealth technologies, and coaching techniques. Telephone communication was regularly reported as a type of intervention follow-up. The impact on QoL was mixed and no firm conclusions can be drawn. However, our review revealed a beneficial effect of education. Conclusions and practical implications Interventions including educational components seem promising for supporting self-management and showed a beneficial effect on QoL. More research is needed to explore where, by whom and how interventions are ideally delivered.

Chronic conditions; Health policies; Self-management; QoL

慢性非传染性疾病 ; 医疗护理 ; 卫生服务 ; 技术资源 ; 公众健康认知

成年人

Not Available

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。