Health Policy

ISSN:

0168-8510

国家:

United Kingdom

影响因子:

3.6 (2023)

SCIE收录情况:

SCIE , SSCI

JCR分区:

Q1

摘要

Objectives To review the evidence on public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care; to examine the different methods, levels and stages of involving the public; to synthesise the contributions of the public, as well as the identified tensions, facilitating strategies and recommendations for good practice. Method Systematic literature search and narrative review. Findings Seven case examples were found covering the following review topics: patients’ perspectives on electro-convulsive therapy; user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research; treatments for degenerative ataxias; teaching, learning and assessment of law in social work education; HIV health promotion for men who have sex with men; the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of public involvement in health research; methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. The public was found to contribute to systematic reviews by: refining the scope of the review; suggesting and locating relevant literature; appraising the literature; interpreting the review findings; writing up the review. Numerous tensions, facilitating strategies and recommendations were identified. Conclusions The issues raised in this paper should assist researchers in developing and conducting systematic reviews with the involvement of the public.

Public involvement; Systematic reviews; Design; Conduct; Narrative literature review

卫生服务 ; 卫生治理 ; 项目管理 ; 公众健康认知 ; 卫生政策

混合人群

Not Available

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。