Lancet Reg Health Am

ISSN:

国家:

Brazil

影响因子:

SCIE收录情况:

JCR分区:

Angelica Amorim Amato; Angelica Amorim Amato; Henry Maia Peixoto; Marcio Coutinho Xavier Naves; Ivan Ricardo Zimmermann
2024-12-28 相关链接

摘要

Background:
     
     Heart failure, a complex clinical syndrome with high morbidity and mortality, has become a significant burden on public health. Recently, a new class of antidiabetic agents-the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-was associated with a significant reduction on mortality and hospitalization in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) when added to standard pharmacological treatment. Considering the lack of data on its cost-effectiveness, the present study aims to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of add-on dapagliflozin treatment for HFrEF from the Brazilian public healthcare system perspective.
   

Methods:
     
     We built a Markov model to estimate the clinical outcomes and costs of 1,000 hypothetical subjects with established HFrEF in a lifetime horizon. The model inputs were based on the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) trial and local data. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, as well as scenario analyses, were performed.
   

Findings:
     
     The addition of dapagliflozin to standard care treatment in 1,000 HFrEF patients yielded an expected value of 366.99 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of US$ 1,517,878.49, resulting in an ICER of US$ 4,136.08 per QALY gained, being a cost-effective strategy considering the Brazilian official cost-effectiveness threshold (US$ 8,000/QALY). In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, 96.60% of the simulations were also cost-effective. In the scenario analyses, results were similar for individuals with and without diabetes.
   

Interpretation:
     
     Dapagliflozin is likely to be cost-effective when added to standard HFrEF therapy in Brazil.
   

Funding:
     
     This study was supported by the National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (Instituto de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde-IATS).
   

化学药 ; 药械使用

混合人群

Not Available

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。