兰州大学循证社会科学交叉创新实验室 Innovation Laboratory of Evidence-based Social Sciences,Lanzhou University

Gender equity in epidemiology: a policy brief.

2019-01-01


     
     The under-representation of women in leadership in scientific fields presents a serious problem. Gender diversity is integral to innovation and productivity, and inequality leads to loss of gender talent in science including epidemiology. This policy brief summarizes some of the key dimensions and determinants contributing to gender-equity gaps in epidemiology and other scientific fields, relevant to developed countries where there is more published evidence. Women in scientific fields hold fewer positions on editorial boards, lack equal representation in speaking engagements at conferences, and are less likely to publish or receive top tier grant funding. Reasons for these inequities range from unconscious bias, biased promotion systems, and traditional norms in the division of family life and labor in our society leading to the attrition of women in academia. Addressing the problem of gender inequity, as a component of gender inequality, will provide an ethical basis to advance innovation. Data on gender equity in the field of epidemiology are sparse. We call on academic institutions, professional societies and associations, and editorial boards relevant to epidemiology (as well as other academic disciplines more broadly) to take meaningful action to build an evidence base as to the extent of gender inequities in epidemiologic research, teaching, policy, and practice. We outline some of the necessary steps required to achieve gender equity, such as career development and mentoring programs, institutional support, and programs to address bias.
   

研究类型
政策简报
人群
混合人群
主题
["卫生治理","其他"]
国家
United States
关键词
Bias; Epidemiology; Inequity; Women
来源期刊
Ann Epidemiol
发布日期
2019-01-01
全文链接
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6779121/
相关网址
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31036443/
DOI
10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.010
作者
International Network for Epidemiology in Policy Melinda C Aldrich Anne E Cust Camille Raynes-Greenow