China’s Lessons from the Russia-Ukraine War: Perceived New Strategic Opportunities and an Emerging Model of Hybrid Warfare
发布日期
2025-05-22
摘要

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) have committed significant efforts to studying the Russia-Ukraine war and drawing lessons for Chinese policy. What lessons are CCP leaders taking from the Russia-Ukraine war and how do these lessons influence China’s future policies? The authors assessed CCP and PLA views of the war’s drivers and outcomes to understand the adaptations that China will likely make for its own competition with the United States. By understanding China’s perspective on and adaptations resulting from the war, U.S. policymakers can better inform decisions related to force development, posture, and employment. 

Research findings collectively suggest that China has increasing opportunities to take advantage of the Russia-Ukraine war to prepare for a future conflict of its own, but its opportunities to avoid such a conflict altogether are diminishing. Party leaders assess that this degraded security environment grants China new strategic opportunities to shape global narratives and security architectures. As a result, the PLA is transitioning to a new vision of warfare that relies less on compelling enemies to surrender with minimal employment of military force and is more resigned to fighting a costly, protracted conflict. 

成果类型
Research
全文链接
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA3100/RRA3141-4/RAND_RRA3141-4.pdf
来源平台
主题
China
发现
The PLA sounds the alarm over weakening deterrencePLA analysts reportedly think that Russian strategists overestimated their ability to deter military escalation using nonmilitary tools of hybrid warfare, resulting in disastrous battlefield outcomes. Given this failure, the PLA may be becoming doubtful that it can prevent U.S.-China competition from rupturing into conflict. As a result, the PLA is redefining hybrid warfare to include the use of nonmilitary tools for enhancing lethality rather than deterring the use of military force.CCP support for Russia is enduringCCP leaders appear to remain strategically and ideologically committed to supporting Russia in opposition to what both countries view as U.S. hegemony. China’s interests in the United States and European Union could limit the scale or nature of this support, but, overall, CCP support for Russia is likely to continue.CCP views U.S. alliances as vulnerable targetsCCP analysts insist that U.S. alliances persist because the United States manufactures crises to justify alliances, not because their allies share interests or values. Accordingly, CCP analysts see these alliances as vulnerable and assess that China has opportunities to use disinformation to weaken U.S. alliances.The PLA surmises that protraction will blunt U.S. technology advantagesPLA researchers assess that the U.S. defense industrial base cannot sustain a protracted war and that the margin of U.S. technological superiority will diminish as a war continues. They assess that protracting a future conflict could mitigate U.S. technological superiority and that China’s defense mobilization system offers advantages in such a conflict.
建议
The U.S. Department of the Air Force should continue development of proliferated satellite constellations.The U.S. Department of the Air Force should prepare to operate from degraded environments for longer periods.The U.S. Department of Defense should develop integrated operational concepts for protracted conflict.The U.S. Department of Defense should sustain and focus defense industrial base investments to build capacity for priority munitions and systems needed for protracted conflict.The U.S. Department of Defense should build cyber resilience in the defense industrial base.The U.S. Department of Defense should elevate messaging and collaboration with security partners.The U.S. government should fund expansion of defense industrial base capacity.The U.S. government should maintain current policy pursuing expanded diplomatic exchange and confidence-building measures with China.

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。