Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

ISSN:

国家:

United Kingdom

影响因子:

SCIE收录情况:

JCR分区:

Helen Staley;Aslam Shiraz;Norman Shreeve;Andrew Bryant;Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch;Ketankumar Gajjar; Helen Staley;Aslam Shiraz;Norman Shreeve;Andrew Bryant;Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch;Ketankumar Gajjar
2021-09 相关链接

摘要

Background

World-wide, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Increasing the uptake of screening, alongside increasing informed choice is of great importance in controlling this disease through prevention and early detection.
Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at women, to increase the uptake, including informed uptake, of cervical cancer screening.
Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Issue 1, 2009. MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases up to March 2009. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.
Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to increase uptake/informed uptake of cervical cancer screening.
Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.
Main results

Thirty-eight trials met our inclusion criteria. These trials assessed the effectiveness of invitational and educational interventions, counselling, risk factor assessment and procedural interventions. Heterogeneity between trials limited statistical pooling of data. Overall, however, invitations appear to be effective methods of increasing uptake. In addition, there is limited evidence to support the use of educational materials. Secondary outcomes including cost data were incompletely documented so evidence was limited. Most trials were at moderate risk of bias. Informed uptake of cervical screening was not reported in any trials.
Authors' conclusions

There is evidence to support the use of invitation letters to increase the uptake of cervical screening. There is limited evidence to support educational interventions but it is unclear what format is most effective. The majority of the studies are from developed countries and so the relevance to developing countries is unclear.

卫生服务 ; 妇幼卫生

混合人群

Not Available

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。