兰州大学循证社会科学交叉创新实验室 Innovation Laboratory of Evidence-based Social Sciences,Lanzhou University

Two programs, too many names? A critical review of ride-sharing and safe-ride programs as alternatives to impaired driving.

2025-01-01

Introduction:
     
     Alternative transportation programs are widely promoted as a viable strategy for prevention of alcohol-impaired driving (AID) and crashes, with ride-sharing and safe-ride being two major approaches. The scientific literature on these programs frequently uses the terms "ride-sharing" and "safe-ride" interchangeably, though their meaning is not synonymous. This critical review set out to clarify the main characteristics of these programs to advance research, dissemination of the findings, and knowledge transfer in the alternative transportation field for AID and crash prevention.
   

Method:
     
     A systematic literature search of six databases using the PRISMA-S checklist identified studies of ride-sharing and safe-ride programs to prevent AID or crashes. Inclusion criteria comprised studies published in academic and gray literature between 1980 and 2023. A six-step thematic analysis of included studies identified the defining characteristics of each program.
   

Results:
     
     The 32 included studies evaluated for-profit ride-sharing/ride-hailing programs (n = 21) and safe-ride programs (n = 11). No studies on non-profit ride-sharing programs were identified. Analyses revealed two main themes. Operational strategies were most important for distinguishing between for-profit ride-sharing and safe-ride programs, with differences in these subthemes: purpose (revenue generation vs. AID reduction), management (private vs. private plus other strategies), funding (self-financing vs. external), and promotion (convenient transportation vs. dangers of AID). Service offerings, the second theme, highlighted differences in program costs, availability, accessibility, service capacity, coverage, and types of vehicles used.
   

Discussion:
     
     The scientific literature on ride-sharing was limited to for-profit ride-sharing, suggesting that referring to them as "ride-hailing" in future studies would be more accurate. Both operational strategies and service offerings highlight the advantages and disadvantages of ride-hailing and safe-ride programs in the context of AID. Some programs referred to as ride-sharing programs have the same operational strategies as safe-ride programs, suggesting these be classified as safe-ride programs for conceptual coherence.
   

研究类型
系统评价
人群
混合人群
主题
["酒精和烟草","其他"]
国家
Canada
关键词
Alternative transportation; DUI; DWI; Drunk driving; Ride-Hailing; Ride-sourcing; Thematic analysis
来源期刊
J Safety Res
发布日期
2025-01-01
全文链接
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40483074/
相关网址
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40483074/
DOI
10.1016/j.jsr.2025.03.006
作者
Asma Mamri Thomas G Brown Marie Claude Ouimet José Ignacio Nazif-Muñoz