Purpose: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience the highest rates of injury-related deaths globally, exacerbated by a lack of robust emergency medical services (EMS). Though fractures contribute substantially to global injury, little is known about prehospital management of extremity fractures in LMICs. Methods: This review included literature published between January 2000 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria pertained to prehospital settings, defined as care rendered prior to hospital presentation, including care provided by lay first responders (LFRs), professional EMS personnel, and traditional bonesetters (TBS). Multiple authors used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess texts meeting inclusion criteria, extracting relevant details for analysis. Results: Of 1251 articles identified, 25 met inclusion criteria. Studies spanned 9 countries across 4 continents, with 14 articles studying care by TBS, 9 by LFRs, and 2 by other prehospital providers. LFR training courses report a combined weighted average pre-/post-course difference of 29.16 percentage points. A total of 67% of included studies report adverse outcomes associated with TBS-managed fractures in the prehospital setting. TBS care is often sought prior to hospital presentation due to sociocultural beliefs, accessibility, and cheaper costs. Few training courses for TBS have been performed, though one course reports a 20.4% increase in fracture management knowledge. Conclusion: In certain resource-limited settings, TBS provide most initial fracture management, which may adversely impact outcomes. Knowledge transfer has been demonstrated during prehospital fracture management courses for LFRs and TBS. Early evidence suggests TBS training and integration into healthcare systems may reduce complication rates, improving long-term outcomes.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, presenting a significant public health challenge. Even with medical research advancements, their incidence remains rising due to modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors across lifestyle, environmental, genetic, and socioeconomic factors. This narrative review identifies and synthesizes key risk factors contributing to GI cancers, including unhealthy diets (high consumption of processed foods, red meat, and added sugars), physical inactivity, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, infections (e.g., Helicobacter pylori), environmental pollution, chronic stress, and socioeconomic disparities. The review emphasizes the interaction among these factors and how this interplay is responsible for the development and progression of GI cancer. It emphasizes the importance of early detection, lifestyle modifications, and public health interventions tailored to specific populations. Understanding these interconnected risk factors provides critical insights for guiding prevention strategies, policymaking, and health education. Addressing modifiable risk factors through a comprehensive, multi-sectoral approach may significantly reduce the global burden of GI cancers and improve long-term health outcomes.

Background Private equity (PE) investment in U.S. nursing homes has increased significantly over the past two decades. The emergence of this novel ownership model has prompted concerns regarding its effects on nursing home performance, especially quality. Objective This systematic review examined the impact of PE ownership on U.S. nursing homes, focusing on quality of care and financial performance. The review was conceptually informed by agency theory and the structure-process-outcome (SPO) framework. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search across five databases identified 12 studies published between 2000 and 2024. Eligible studies examined the effects of PE ownership on nursing home quality or financial performance. Data were extracted and synthesized across these two dimensions. Results Across studies, PE ownership was linked to higher number of deficiencies, increased hospitalization rates, and higher mortality, although some improvements in care processes were noted. Financial outcomes showed initial financial gains but long-term challenges, primarily due to high debt loads. Conclusions Findings suggest that PE strategies may prioritize short-term profitability, which may compromise quality of care in some instances. These findings highlight the need for financial transparency, and reimbursement models that incentivize long-term quality.

The effective development of health programs requires the practical application of evidence-based strategies, equitable financial allocation, and the integration of operational research into public health actions. These elements are essential for attaining measurable improvements in healthcare systems and population well-being. By aligning research-driven approaches with policy implementation, we can accelerate progress toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG-3) targets. This study aimed to engage in an in-depth, evidence-based quantitative and qualitative analysis of National Family Health Survey (NFHS) datasets, as well as a category and sub-category-wise comparability assessment of health indicators. Each round of the NFHS outcomes was analyzed for its application towards programmatic development, implementation, and evaluation. Studies analyzed were representative of each of the studied categories, i.e., demography, maternal health, child health, and behavioral pattern. Literature published under the subheads demography (159), maternal health (286), child health (318), and behavioral pattern (94) and indexed on PubMed Central were analyzed for inferential patterned study. This was followed by the outcome comparability and Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Challenges (SWOC) analysis of trends, emphasis, and applicability. This trend analysis was quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. There was a deviation in sub-criterion identification over various rounds, posing challenges to the use of NFHS data with multiple, varied, and rich resources available for healthcare and support. The lowest expected decline per round compared to their previous rounds in stunting, wasting, and unmet need for family planning was -2.5%, -4.3%, and 1%, respectively. In contrast, the lowest increase per round for female sterilization and antenatal care (ANC) was +1.3% and +1%, respectively. Strengths include the quality of data, sub-categorization over NFHS rounds, use of new tools for assessments, and elimination of some parameters. Weakness was illustrated through unsynchronized conduct of rounds, viz., 6, 7, 10, and 5 years' time gap observed in NFHS-1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Opportunity of using data for national development initiatives and fulfilling Sustainable Development Goal-3 can be availed to benefit the healthcare-deprived masses. Threats include intrinsic limitations of data collection, processes of outcome measures for addressing upgradation needs, especially of Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, Child Health + Adolescents (RMNCH+A), National Programme for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Disease (NPNCD), and national nutrition programs. The policy development, programmatic design, intervention implementation, effectiveness assessment, and National Health Program evaluation need stronger, consecutive, and appropriate evidence datasets for public health action. The felt need of public health intervention can be augmented significantly by using NFHS datasets over time while ensuring adaptable, flexible, and resource-friendly mechanisms of action. Triangulating NFHS datasets, programmatic needs, and financial allocations will hence help create user-friendly public health networks.

Abstract Over the past two decades, private equity (PE) firms-private investors that use large pools of money to buy into and restructure companies-have become increasingly involved in U.S. healthcare ownership and management. PE's goal of acquiring quick financial gains is typically accomplished by assigning debt to the facilities and practices it buys, cutting labor costs, changing services to the most lucrative, upcoding diagnostic codes to raise prices, and merging, shutting down, or selling practices. This study shows that private equity has expanded into nearly every corner of U.S. healthcare, and in some sectors, such as hospitals, nursing homes and physician specialties, quite significantly. The PE business model is theorized to be incompatible with high quality, efficient, accessible healthcare. Empirical research supports this framework to some extent. Few studies find evidence for better healthcare quality/patient outcomes or lower expenditures. A few studies find better access in profitable areas for PE, and three find lower operating costs and/or higher operating margins, which may have negative impacts in other healthcare system outcomes. A few studies show no difference in various healthcare system outcomes. Otherwise, the preponderance of studies indicates worse or mixed (mostly worse) outcomes with PE ownership. PE involvement in healthcare is greater in the U.S. than Europe, but there is potential for it to reach similar levels in Europe. Federal and state policy initiatives to regulate PE in U.S. healthcare are in the incipient stage and would benefit greatly by more research on PE's impacts.

Background: Over ten years since the first qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was published in the Cochrane Library, QES and mixed-methods reviews (MMR) with a qualitative component have become increasingly common and influential in healthcare research and policy development. The quality of such reviews and the completeness with which they are reported is therefore of paramount importance. Aim: This review aimed to assess the reporting quality of published QESs and MMRs with a qualitative component in the Cochrane Library. Methods: All published QESs and MMRs were identified from the Cochrane Library. A bespoke framework developed by key international experts based on the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) and meta-ethnography reporting guidance (eMERGe) was used to code the quality of reporting of QESs and MMRs. Results: Thirty-one reviews were identified, including 11 MMRs. The reporting quality of the QESs and MMRs published by Cochrane varied considerably. Based on the criteria within our framework, just over a quarter (8, 26%) were considered to meet satisfactory reporting standards, 10 (32%) could have provided clearer or more detailed descriptions in their reporting, just over a quarter (8, 26%) provided poor quality or insufficient descriptions and five (16%) omitted descriptions relevant to our framework. Conclusion: This assessment offers important insights into the reporting practices prevalent in these review types. Methodology and reporting have changed considerably over time. Earlier QES have not necessarily omitted important reporting components, but rather our understanding of what should be completed and reported has grown considerably. The variability in reporting quality within QESs and MMRs underscores the need to develop Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) specifically for QES.

Aims: The World Health Organization (WHO) Health Emergency Programme funded three systematic reviews to inform development of guidance for emergency preparedness in health emergencies. The current review investigated the type of learning interventions that have been developed and used during health emergencies, and how they were developed. Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete (EBSCO), and Web of Science. Study quality was appraised by WHO-recommended method-specific checklists. Findings were extracted using a narrative summary approach. Results: 187 studies were included. Studies were split between online, in-person, and hybrid modalities, conducted mostly by hospitals and universities, and most frequently training nurses and doctors. Studies emphasized experiential learning to develop and reinforce skills; online learning for knowledge dissemination; multi-sectoral partnerships, institutional support and carefully constructed planning task forces, rapid training development and dissemination, and use of training models. Conclusion: It Most studies evaluated only knowledge or self-confidence of trainees. Relatively few assessed skills; evaluations of long-term outcomes were rare. Little evidence is available about comparative effectiveness of different approaches, or optimum frequency and length of training programming. Based on principles induced, six recommendations for future JIT training are presented.

Background and aims: Current and future healthcare professionals, such as medical students, are at risk of contracting Hepatitis B virus infection. Vaccination against Hepatitis B is an effective means of prevention. However, studies have reported variable vaccination rates among medical students from different regions of South Asia. Understanding vaccination rates and barriers can guide effective interventions to protect future doctors. Therefore, we aimed to find out the vaccination rate among medical students in South Asia. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and other sources) beginning from inception to July 15, 2024. Observational studies reporting vaccination rates among Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (M.B.B.S.) students in South Asia were included. Two reviewers independently screened and performed the quality assessment. Pooled vaccination rates were calculated and visualized using a random-effects model in R Studio (Version 2023.12.0). Subgroup analysis was performed based on country and year of publication of the studies. Results: Fifty studies from the South Asian region, including 12,231 participants, were included in the quantitative analysis. The overall pooled Hepatitis B vaccination rate using the random-effects model was 56% (CI: 49-63%), with significant heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 98%; P = 0). Subgroup analysis based on country revealed a significant regional variation in vaccination rate (59% in Pakistan, 57% in India, 55% in Nepal, and 41% in Bangladesh; P < 0.01). Lack of awareness, perceived low risk or necessity, concerns about side effects, logistical challenges, and lack of motivation have been reported as barriers to vaccination. Conclusion: The overall vaccination rate was relatively low in South Asia, with significant regional variation. Based on the reported barriers, we recommend that relevant authorities focus on vaccination awareness, motivation, cost-effectiveness, logistics management, policy formulation, and monitoring.

Introduction: There is no recent consensus on the effectiveness of teledentistry versus in-person examination in the diagnosis of dental caries, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry versus in-person examination for dental caries diagnosis (PROSPERO #CRD42023410962). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of teledentistry versus in-person examination for dental caries diagnosis. The eligibility criteria were peer-reviewed studies published in English between January 2013 and December 2021 that reported diagnostic parameters (specificity and sensitivity) for caries detection in primary and permanent dentition. Articles were extracted using search strategies from PubMed and CINAHL databases and screened using PRISMA-DTA guidelines, following a review for quality assessment and risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists. Meta-analysis was conducted in R using the MADA package. A descriptive analysis of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and confidence intervals was performed with respective forest plots. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane and Higgins's 2 tests. Univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy were performed based on the DerSimonian-Laird random effect and reported summary diagnostic odds ratios. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed and included in the meta-analysis. The diagnostic parameters ranged from 45.6% to 88.3% for sensitivity, 55.2% to 98.3% for specificity, 79% to 92% for positive predictive value, 48% to 97% for negative predictive value, and 70% to 96% for accuracy. The κ scores ranged from 0.46 to 0.89 for teledentistry modalities. Tests for equality of sensitivities and specificities were significant ( < 0.001). The studies were not heterogeneous with Cochran's : 14.502 ( = 0.206) and Higgins's 2 of 24%. The multivariable analysis showed a diagnostic odds ratio based on the DerSimonian-Laird random effect of 35.14, which indicates that the odds of caries detection via teledentistry is 35 times more true positive (i.e., correctly identifying a positive condition) than false positive. Conclusions: Diagnosis of caries via teledentistry is effective and comparable to in-person diagnosis. Remote assessments are consistent in diagnostic accuracy for caries.Knowledge Transfer Statement:This systematic review and meta-analysis added to the evidence about using teledentistry assessment as a diagnostically accurate tool to detect dental caries. Using teledentistry dental practices could promote greater access to dental and oral health care in the absence of in-person assessment.

Containment policies were essential in controlling the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, but they also introduced significant economic challenges. This scoping review aimed to examine the macroeconomic indicators used to assess COVID-19 closure and containment policies in the United States. We reviewed 42 eligible studies from 4516 records identified across PubMed, Web of Science, and EconLit. These studies explored various economic impacts, focusing on employment, labor market indicators, consumer spendings, etc., primarily using publicly available sources. During the pandemic, high-frequency data (eg, mobility and card transactions) became newly accessible and played a key role in evaluating the real-time effects of mitigation policies. Our review summarizes macroeconomic indicators investigated and provides researchers and policymakers with a list of data sources for assessment of economic impacts in the future. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive evaluations to balance public health measures with economic considerations in future pandemic responses.

Purpose: To perform a scoping review of the literature investigating the use of telemedicine in retinoblastoma (RB) care, as well as its integration into broader health-care systems worldwide. Methods: A comprehensive search of academic databases, Medline and Embase, as well as public, web-based sources, was performed. Article references were also screened for inclusion within the review. Only English-language sources that presented evidence of dedicated frameworks incorporating telemedicine-based RB care were included. Results: The review identified 57 peer-reviewed studies, of which 19 were found potentially eligible for inclusion. Following exclusion criteria and a web-based search, 11 sources referencing 10 telemedicine frameworks, comprising four peer-reviewed articles, and seven publicly available initiatives, were included. Major themes leveraging telemedicine in RB care included knowledge exchange and capacity building, the establishment of direct partnerships incorporating teleconsultation, and the development of care coordination networks. Many telehealth platforms were effectively integrated into health-care systems; however, challenges included the absence of RB specific initiatives, the need for publicly available, measurable peer-reviewed outcomes and the complexities of multidimensional RB care. Conclusion: Tele-efforts have the potential to enhance delivery of RB care to remote, resource-limited communities. Future research should explore improved integration of policy-driven telemedicine within health-care systems, assess the economic feasibility of providing such care, and facilitate empirical evaluations, ultimately leading to increased sustainability, funding and investment of these models.

Objectives: This systematic review (SR) highlights principles for nutrient clinical trials and explore the diverse physiological functions of vitamin D beyond its traditional role in the musculoskeletal system related to clinical study designs. Background: Thousands of published research articles have investigated the benefits of vitamin D (a nutrient example taken in this SR) beyond the musculoskeletal system, including the immune, pulmonary, and cardiovascular systems; pregnancy; autoimmune disorders; and cancer. They illustrated vitamin D's molecular mechanisms, interactions, and genomic and nongenomic actions. Methods: This SR was designed to identify shortcomings in clinical study designs, statistical methods, and data interpretation that led to inconsistent findings in vitamin D-related publications. SR also highlights examples and insights into avoiding study design errors in future clinical studies, including randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). The SR adheres to the latest PRISMA statement, guidelines, and the PICOS process. Results: Inappropriate or flawed study designs were frequent in clinical trials. Major failures discussed here include too short clinical study duration, inadequate or infrequent doses, insufficient statistical power, failure to measure baseline and achieved levels, and recruiting vitamin D-sufficient participants. These design errors have led to misleading interpretations. Thus, conclusions from such studies should not be generalized or used in guidelines, recommendations, or policymaking. Conclusion: Adequately powered epidemiological studies and RCTs with sufficient vitamin D and duration in individuals with vitamin D deficiency reported favorable clinical outcomes, enriching the literature, enabling to understand its physiology and mechanisms. Proper study designs with rigorous methodologies and cautious interpretation of outcomes are crucial in advancing the nutrient field. The principles discussed apply not only to vitamin D, but also other micro-nutrients and nutraceutical research. Adhering to them enhances the credibility and reliability of clinical trials, SRs, and meta-analysis outcomes. The study emphasizes the importance of focused, hypothesis-driven, well-designed, statistically powered RCTs to explore the diverse benefits of nutrients, conducted in index nutrient deficient participants, and avoidance of study design errors. Findings from such studies should be incorporated into clinical practice, policymaking, and public health guidelines, improving the health of the nation and reducing healthcare costs.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the volume (number of studies) and nature (topics and designs) of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications on chiropractic learners and programs worldwide. Introduction: Despite the expansion of the chiropractic profession and its recognition by entities such as the World Health Organization, a gap exists in comprehending the international landscape of chiropractic education. No prior studies have systematically mapped the volume and nature of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications. A scoping review of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications is needed to guide future policy development, research agendas, and educational initiatives within the chiropractic profession. Inclusion criteria: Publications in the indexed literature on chiropractic students, graduates, academics, and programs in any chiropractic education setting were included. Studies focused on chiropractic programs and education for chiropractic students or chiropractors worldwide. All research designs, literature reviews, descriptive studies, and commentaries were included. Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The databases PubMed (NLM), Scopus, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Index to Chiropractic Literature, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, and Educational Resources Information Center were searched from their inception to November 5 and 6, 2023, with no language limits. Data were extracted for primary topics, study designs, and regions of the included documents and entered in Covidence by paired independent reviewers. The findings were organized into figures and tables with a narrative description. Results: The search identified 7494 documents. After deduplication, 5041 were screened for relevance, of which 667 were selected for full-text review. From these, 598 were selected for data extraction. The chiropractic education topics included values/ethical competence (n=3), personal/behavioral competence (n=34), knowledge and cognitive competence (n=49), functional and clinical competence (n=93), and program-relevant research (n=419). Most designs were quantitative (n=391), followed by descriptive reports (n=91), qualitative (n=43), mixed methods (n=40), commentaries (n=22), and literature reviews (n=11). Chiropractic education was most studied in the United States (n=359), Australia (n=116), and Canada (n=106). Conclusions: This scoping review reports the volume and nature of indexed publications relating to chiropractic learners and programs worldwide. This body of literature contains learner competencies in knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as studies about chiropractic programs. The increasing number of publications and proportion of study designs over time show that chiropractic scholars and programs are engaged in collecting, analyzing, and distributing data relevant to education and training. The map of professional competencies in the chiropractic education literature shows that the profession possesses the fundamental traits needed to contribute to the global health care workforce. Review registration: Open Science Frameworkhttps://osf.io/9b3ap.

Background: The economic and public health benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccines vary across countries due to different epidemiology and costs. We systematically reviewed and summarized findings and assumptions of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of the recently introduced 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15 and PCV20) in adults. Methods: We performed a systematic search for CEA studies of PCV15 and/or PCV20 versus existing strategies via PubMed, EMBASE, CEA Registry, EconLit, HTA Database, and NITAG resource center through April 23, 2024. Study characteristics, methods, assumptions, and findings were extracted independently by two reviewers; quality was assessed using ECOBIAS. Results were synthesized qualitatively to summarize key attributes and conclusions. Results: Of 137 identified records, 26 studies were included; the majority (24/26) concerned high-income countries. All employed static Markov-type models comparing higher-valent PCVs used alone or in combination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) to current recommendations (PPSV23 alone, PCV13 alone, PCV13 + PPSV23, no vaccination). Most studies (22/26) concluded PCV20 used alone was cost-saving (dominant) or cost-effective compared to other adult pneumococcal strategies (PPSV23 alone, PCV13 ± PPSV23, PCV15 ± PPSV23, or no vaccination). PCVs were generally assumed to have serotype-specific effectiveness equal to PCV13 efficacy in the pivotal trial, though four studies used estimates from a Delphi panel; protection was assumed to last between 10 and 20 years. PPSV23 was assumed to have lower effectiveness against non-bacteremic pneumonia and shorter duration of protection. Herd effects from higher-valent PCVs in childhood (12/26), serotype replacement (2/26), or both (1/26) were included in half (13/26) of studies, which attenuated adult vaccine impact. Most studies were assessed as low risk of bias; five abstracts did not provide sufficient information for assessment. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that 20-valent PCV used alone is likely to be cost-effective or dominate other adult pneumococcal strategies. Future research is needed to address remaining uncertainties in assumptions and to support evidence-based policymaking.

Background: The economic and public health benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccines vary across countries due to different epidemiology and costs. We systematically reviewed and summarized findings and assumptions of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of the recently introduced 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15 and PCV20) in adults. Methods: We performed a systematic search for CEA studies of PCV15 and/or PCV20 versus existing strategies via PubMed, EMBASE, CEA Registry, EconLit, HTA Database, and NITAG resource center through April 23, 2024. Study characteristics, methods, assumptions, and findings were extracted independently by two reviewers; quality was assessed using ECOBIAS. Results were synthesized qualitatively to summarize key attributes and conclusions. Results: Of 137 identified records, 26 studies were included; the majority (24/26) concerned high-income countries. All employed static Markov-type models comparing higher-valent PCVs used alone or in combination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) to current recommendations (PPSV23 alone, PCV13 alone, PCV13 + PPSV23, no vaccination). Most studies (22/26) concluded PCV20 used alone was cost-saving (dominant) or cost-effective compared to other adult pneumococcal strategies (PPSV23 alone, PCV13 ± PPSV23, PCV15 ± PPSV23, or no vaccination). PCVs were generally assumed to have serotype-specific effectiveness equal to PCV13 efficacy in the pivotal trial, though four studies used estimates from a Delphi panel; protection was assumed to last between 10 and 20 years. PPSV23 was assumed to have lower effectiveness against non-bacteremic pneumonia and shorter duration of protection. Herd effects from higher-valent PCVs in childhood (12/26), serotype replacement (2/26), or both (1/26) were included in half (13/26) of studies, which attenuated adult vaccine impact. Most studies were assessed as low risk of bias; five abstracts did not provide sufficient information for assessment. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that 20-valent PCV used alone is likely to be cost-effective or dominate other adult pneumococcal strategies. Future research is needed to address remaining uncertainties in assumptions and to support evidence-based policymaking.

Vaccine hesitancy is a significant global issue and is recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as one of the most pressing threats to public health. Defined as the delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite their availability, vaccine hesitancy undermines decades of progress in preventing vaccine-preventable diseases. The issue is complex, influenced by misinformation, distrust in healthcare systems, cultural beliefs, and access barriers. These challenges require innovative and empathetic solutions to increase vaccine acceptance. Addressing this growing epidemic requires a multifaceted approach, which involves broader strategies and policymaking and in addition, effective communication tools for clinicians. Motivational Interviewing (MI), a patient-centered communication technique, offers an effective strategy to address pediatric vaccine hesitancy by fostering trust, understanding, and informed decision-making. This review aims to explore the problem of pediatric vaccine hesitancy in the United States, examine its underlying factors, and highlight evidence-based strategies, including Motivational Interviewing, to address this growing concern in clinical and public health settings. It offers practical guidance for healthcare providers and pediatricians to tackle this growing problem effectively and emphasizes the need for a combined effort of communication, community outreach, education, and systemic policy to overcome vaccine hesitancy.

Overview Equitable access to learning opportunities is one of UNICEF strategic priorities, described in the organization’s SPs and Education Strategy. Since 2010, UNICEF has been supporting out-of-school children and adolescents through its participation in the Global Initiative for Out-of-School Children (OoSCI). The school closures and the mobility restrictions experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of children and adolescents at risk of not returning to school, particularly affecting the most marginalized and vulnerable. The evaluation aims at generating evidence to assess the work done by UNICEF in this area for accountability and learning purposes. 22. More recently, to expand access to learning and skill development opportunities for children and adolescents, the organization is rolling out the Multiple and Flexible Pathways Initiative. This initiative focuses on supporting the most marginalized and vulnerable, including efforts to guide policy reforms and to improve public budgeting and financing strategies to expand access to MFPs to learning and skills development. This initiative is being guided by the 2020 Secondary Education Guidance: Multiple and Flexible Pathway and the 2015 and 2023 OosCI operational manuals. The evaluation will assess prior and ongoing work in this area with a learning and forward-looking purpose. The overall objective of this evaluation is to assess UNICEF work in support of addressing the issues as they relate to ISCA at risk of dropping out of school and out-of-school children and adolescents (OoSCA). The evaluation aims to evaluate the extent to which UNICEF efforts have made a difference in supporting the school retention and the transition into higher formal education levels of ISCA at risk of dropping out; facilitating the return to formal education of OoSCA; and increasing the access to MFPs to learning and skills development. Report Details Year Published 2025 Type Project/Programme Joint No Partner/s N/A Consultant name Tami Aritomi Agency Focal Point Wycliffe Otieno Focal Point Email wotieno@unicef.org Managed by Independent Evaluation Office No Geographic Scope Country Country/ies United States

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth resurfaced as a convenient efficient healthcare delivery method. Researchers indicate that Artificial Intelligence (AI) could further facilitate delivering quality care in telehealth. It is essential to find supporting evidence to use AI-assisted telehealth interventions in nursing. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review focuses on finding users' satisfaction and perception of AI-assisted telehealth intervention, performances of AI algorithms, and the types of AI technology used. METHODS: A structured search was performed in six databases, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, OVID, PsycINFO, and ProQuest, following the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews. The quality of the final reviewed studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS: Eight of the 41 studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the final review. Six studies were conducted in the United States, one in Japan, and one in South Korea. Four studies collected data from participants (n = 3014). Two studies used image data (n = 1986), and two used sensor data from smart homes to detect patients' health events for nurses (n = 35). The quality of studies implied moderate to high-quality study (mean = 10.1, range = 7.7-13.7). Two studies reported high user satisfaction, three assessed user perception of AI in telehealth, and only one showed high AI acceptability. Two studies revealed the high performance of AI algorithms. Five studies used machine learning algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: AI-assisted telehealth interventions were efficient and promising and could be an effective care delivery method in nursing.

Rationale: Despite growing emphasis among healthcare decision-makers on patient perspectives and real-world outcomes to inform care and access decisions, understanding of patient journey experiences in rare diseases remains limited due to data collection and evaluation challenges. Aims and objectives: This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed study designs, methodologies, and outcomes reported in real-world investigations of rare disease patient journeys. Methods: Searches in PubMed and Google Scholar targeted English-language publications and congress proceedings from 1 January 2014, to 30 April 2024, including rare disease patients, caregivers, or healthcare providers. Keywords included 'Journey', 'Path', or 'Odyssey'. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and abstracted data. Descriptive analyses and quality assessments were conducted. Results: Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria, with 296,548 participants spanning over 600 rare diseases. Most studies used prospective observational (61%) and cross-sectional (26%) designs and were conducted in Europe (45%). Interviews (39%) and surveys (29%) were common methodologies. Patients (87%) were the primary research focus, compared to caregivers (32%) or providers (10%). The most studied journey stages were 'Pre-diagnosis/Screening' (97%) and 'Diagnosis' (84%), while 'Disease Awareness' (16%) and 'Treatment Adherence' (6%) were less common. Across 164 outcomes reported, frequent outcomes included 'Healthcare Resource Utilization' (94%), 'Symptoms' (74%), and 'Time-to-Diagnosis' (71%). Fewer studies reported 'Costs' (19%), 'Caregiver/Family Burden' (16%), and 'Productivity' (13%). Time-to-diagnosis averaged 11.8 years and a median of 6.1 years. All but one study (97%) was rated low or very low quality due to observational designs. Conclusion: Most rare disease patient journey evidence focuses on 'Pre-diagnosis/Screening' and 'Diagnosis' stages using qualitative methods and surveys. While symptoms, time-to-diagnosis, and resource utilization were commonly reported, evidence gaps included treatment adherence, caregiver burden and productivity. Longitudinal assessments to collect real-world care and treatment burden outcomes, including caregiver perspectives, can enhance both clinician and policy decision-making for individuals living with rare diseases.

Background: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States, yet access and outcomes vary by insurance type, race, and socioeconomic status. This systematic review synthesizes U.S.-based evidence on how insurance coverage influences transplant waitlisting, access, and outcomes. AI-assisted analysis was used to quantify disparities and propose policy recommendations. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database (through November 2024) was conducted to identify studies on insurance-related disparities in U.S. kidney transplantation (PROSPERO: CRD42023484733). AI-assisted synthesis using o3-mini-high (2025) was employed to identify patterns and guide policy development. Results: Among 2,163 records, 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Patients with Medicare or Medicaid-particularly racial and ethnic minorities-had lower referral rates and higher transplant waitlist rejection compared to those with private insurance. Socioeconomic barriers such as low income and limited education further impaired access and worsened post-transplant outcomes. Publicly insured recipients had higher post-transplant mortality and graft failure rates. Loss of Medicare after 36 months was associated with reduced immunosuppressant adherence and increased rejection. Disparities were amplified by Medicaid expansion variability and inconsistent transplant center policies. AI-assisted analysis confirmed these disparities and generated policy proposals including standardized referral guidelines, lifelong immunosuppressant coverage, targeted financial aid, equity-linked incentives for transplant centers, and scalable digital health solutions. Conclusion: Insurance type, race, and socioeconomic status significantly influence kidney transplant access and outcomes. AI-assisted analysis identified structural inequities and informed targeted policy strategies to advance transplant equity and support broader healthcare reform.