Abstract Background Organizational Health Literacy (OHL) refers to the extent to which organizations facilitate equitable access, comprehension, and use of health information and services for informed decision-making. Objective This study aimed to (1) review and map existing OHL frameworks and (2) propose an innovative OHL framework that addresses gaps identified in current models. Methods A systematic search of academic (Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE) and grey literature from the past 15 years was conducted to identify OHL frameworks. This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Arksey and O’Malley model. A new OHL intervention framework was developed to address gaps in existing models, based on the principles of preventive medicine and the public health action cycle. Results A total of 19 records were included (10 from academic databases and 9 from grey literature), covering diverse approaches and contexts related to OHL. Four intervention levels were identified: integrating HL into formal education, implementing HL assessments, developing interventions for vulnerable populations, and enhancing accessibility to health resources. The proposed framework emphasizes intersectoral collaboration and communication pathways between education and healthcare sectors, facilitating information exchange to continuously adapt interventions to population needs. Conclusion OHL development requires intersectoral collaboration; however, interoperability between sectors remains unaddressed in existing frameworks. This study proposes an innovative model that fosters sectoral connections toward a shared goal, creating a truly collaborative framework.

Background: Oral health is a crucial component of overall well-being, particularly in childhood and adolescence when lifetime habits are established. Health education and theory-Based health promotion interventions can enhance oral health outcomes more effectively than traditional knowledge-transfer methods. Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis were performed with the objective of assessing the effectiveness of theory-Based health education and promotion interventions in impacting oral health outcomes among children and adolescents. Methods: Based on PRISMA and PROSPERO registration, the systematic search in seven databases was performed up to March 2025. Only RCTs involving participants aged 5 to 18 years old and with use of theoretical models like the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, or Social Cognitive Theory were taken into account. Primary outcomes included oral health behavior, knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and clinical indicators like dental plaque, periodontal status, and DMFT. The data were combined through random-effects meta-analysis, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results: Nineteen RCTs were included. Interventions had a significant boost in self-efficacy (SMD = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.99,2.00), oral health-related quality of life (SMD = 7.38, 95% CI: 5.57,9.19), knowledge (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80,1.39), attitudes (SMD = 9.32, 95% CI: 7.08,11.55), and behavior (SMD = 2.58, 95% CI: 2.03,3.12). Significant declines in dental plaque (SMD = -1.92, 95% CI: -2.42,-1.42) and periodontal health (SMD = -1.18, 95% CI: -1.83,-0.53) but not in DMFT scores (SMD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.27,0.04) also occurred. High heterogeneity and small sample of evidence of publication bias were detected. Conclusions: Theory-Based health education and promotion interventions are effective in enhancing oral health outcomes across a wide range of outcomes in children and adolescents. Future research should have long-term follow-up, standardization of outcomes measures, fidelity of intervention, economic evaluations, and equitable provision across diverse populations. Clinical trial number: Not applicable. Trial registration: This systematic review has been registered prospectively in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) with registration number CRD420251026862.

Background: The paucity of actionable data on the epidemiological profile of dental caries among adolescents in Nigeria poses significant challenges to policy formulation and implementation. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of dental caries among adolescents in Nigeria and identify dental caries preventive behaviours associated with dental caries experience among adolescents in Nigeria over 10 years. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on dental caries among adolescents was undertaken in September 2023. Literature searches were conducted across Academic Info, Cochrane Library, Refseek, and PubMed databases and Google Scholar, to identify studies on dental caries prevalence and dental caries preventive behaviour among adolescents in Nigeria that were published between January 2013 and December 2022. Eligible studies included cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies. Studies were also included if they presented data for at least one of the primary outcomes. Excluded were studies without information on the sample size, those with incomplete or overlapping samples, case reports, case series, editorials, or reviews without primary data. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 percentages, and a funnel plot evaluated publication bias. A random effects model was used to determine the prevalence of dental caries with subgroup analysis by sex. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist to assess the quality and integrity of the included studies. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024458849). Results: Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled prevalence of dental caries among adolescents in Nigeria was 23.0% (95% CI: 16-30). The pooled prevalence for males was 16.0% (95% CI: 9-23) and that for females was 22.0% (95% CI: 11-32). The commonest dental caries preventive practices reported were daily tooth brushing, use of fluoride-containing toothpastes, and dental service utilization. Factors associated with dental caries included a history of dental service utilization, poor oral hygiene practices, and consumption of refined carbohydrates in-between-meals. Conclusion: The high prevalence of dental caries among adolescents in Nigeria warrants programmatic attention with an emphasis on improving oral hygiene practices and controlling the consumption of refined carbohydrates in-between-meals. Dental service utilization for dental caries preventive needs to be encouraged.

Background: Despite advances in precision medicine, the translation of genetic and genomic technologies into routine practice is hampered by a heterogeneous and limited evidence base and the absence of standardized evaluation methodologies. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) plays a critical role in bridging this gap, yet assessment approaches and comprehensiveness vary widely. This systematic review aims to map the landscape of the assessment reports on genetic and genomics applications, analyze their methodological aspects and identify gaps. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the international HTA database, were searched for assessment reports of genetic/genomic technologies. Information on reports general characteristics, assessment domains and their components, consulted sources of evidence and reported gaps was extracted. Findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Out of 27,331 screened records, 41 reports were included, predominantly from Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia, mainly aimed at informing policy making for single or multiple gene tests for cancer patients. Most reports used a generic HTA methodology and assessment domains varied across reports. Key clinical aspects, such as clinical accuracy and safety, suffered from evidence gaps (39.0% and 22.0%), while personal and societal aspects were the least investigated assessment domain (48.8-78.0%). Overall, lack of evidence and limited generalizability of findings were the most commonly reported gaps across multiple domains. Conclusions: The review highlighted significant fragmentation in current evaluation methodologies of genetic and genomic applications, with underassessment of analytical/clinical accuracy, safety, and non-health outcomes, alongside evidence gaps and limited generalizability. These issues compromise both evaluation and decision-making process, underscoring the urgent need for alternative study designs and standardized, comprehensive assessment frameworks to facilitate the successful implementation of emerging genetic and genomic technologies.

Background: Both Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Performance Management (PM) are clinical governance disciplines that aim to improve the quality, equity, and financial sustainability of health organizations and systems. Although HTA and PM share many features, to the authors' knowledge, few studies have investigated their interplay. This study attempts to fill this gap by analysing how the literature has explored and developed the integration between HTA and PM concepts and tolls within healthcare sector. Methods: To address this gap, this study examines 33 papers selected through a scoping review that explores the inter of HTA and PM within the healthcare sector. In particular, the paper adopted the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology to select and analyse articles. Results: The review highlights the dynamic convergence of HTA and PM, emphasizing how combining these frameworks and functions can enhance decision-making in healthcare. This integration ensures that technologies are adopted on the basis of proven effectiveness in pursuing healthcare systems goals and that performance metrics align with evidence-based practices, leading to better resource allocation and improved patient outcomes. The literature review underscores the need for further research to understand the integration between HTA and PM and their combined impact on organizational performance, sustainability, and resilience in the healthcare sector. Conclusion: This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on HTA and PM, offering insights for future studies, and practical recommendations for integrating these disciplines to improve healthcare management and policymaking.

This study provides a comprehensive overview of wastewater surveillance studies on pathogens, identifies key characteristics of studies that are associated with public health actions, and highlights the actions resulting from these studies. Many studies refer to the value of wastewater surveillance in public health decision-making, but it remains unclear how many studies support public health action and whether this is incorporated into study designs. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines and used the machine learning tool ASReview to identify wastewater surveillance studies monitoring pathogen circulation in human populations, followed by correlational analyses. A total of 974 studies were included, of which only 84 described public health action. Merely 28 of these incorporated strategies to facilitate action within their study designs. Studies leading to public health action primarily monitored viruses, e.g., SARS-CoV-2 and poliovirus, and since 2024 also influenza A and B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis A virus and mpox virus. Furthermore, studies conducted by public health institutes or targeting non-standard locations are more likely to result in action, whereas those with larger population sizes or focusing on residential areas are less likely to result in action. The most common public health actions included informing health authorities and identifying cases. Our findings highlight the value of learning from existing use cases. While wastewater surveillance can support public health actions, evidence of its use is limited. Future studies should improve study designs by, e.g., incorporating strategies for public health actions to maximize their effectiveness and impact on decision-making.

Fluoridation of community water supplies constitutes one of the most effective public health interventions for preventing dental caries. In recent years, questions have been raised about its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to systematically review and summarize the existing evidence on community water fluoridation (CWF) and dental caries in permanent and deciduous teeth. Five databases and 3 gray databases were searched for relevant studies. Paired reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed their methodological quality. Standard mean differences (SMDs) for dmf(s)/DMFT(S) (decayed, missing, and filled teeth/surface) and odds ratios (ORs) for caries prevalence were measured between exposure or not to CFW for deciduous and permanent teeth. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore whether the study design, continent, or decade of publication changed the point estimates. Seventy-four studies were included in the qualitative analysis: 57 cross-sectional, 13 before-and-after, and 4 cohort studies. Thirty-two studies provided sufficient data for meta-analyses. The overall SMD of DMFT and dmf in those exposed to CWF compared with unexposed were -0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.48 to -0.17, I2 = 96%, P < 0.01) and -0.30 (95% CI: -0.39 to -0.21, I2 = 88%, P < 0.01), respectively. The prevalence of caries was smaller in those exposed to CWF for both the permanent (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.63) and deciduous (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.76) dentitions. Study design, continent, or decade of publication satisfactorily explained the heterogeneity between studies. Communities where water was fluoridated experienced less caries and differences expressed in terms of SMD and prevalence (OR) where of high magnitude, both in children and in adults. The results of the meta-analyses revealed significant differences in caries experience and prevalence in favor of CWF, which represents an effective and comprehensive public health intervention for caries prevention, especially in the primary dentition.Knowledge Transfer Statement:Based on the published literature, the results of this study show that fluoridation of community water supplies is still an effective public health intervention to prevent dental caries, both in children and adults, despite the widespread availability of fluoride-containing dental products, especially toothpaste. This result adds to the existing evidence to support its incorporation into public oral health policies.

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of acquiring and transmitting infections, including COVID-19. Vaccination is a crucial method for preventing the spread of infectious diseases; however, vaccine non-acceptance can hinder optimal vaccine coverage. This research aims to evaluate the level of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and the associated factors among HCWs in West Africa. Methods: A structured literature review of quantitative cross-sectional studies was conducted, searching databases including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), African Journals Online, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycInfo, and Google Scholar. The review focused on studies from April 2021 to February 2023 that examined factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among HCWs in West Africa. Data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies were conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results: Five articles met the inclusion criteria, and they reported that the acceptance level of the COVID-19 vaccine ranged from 38.3% to 73.6%. Barriers to acceptance included concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness, side effects, short duration of clinical trials, limited and false information, and lack of social trust. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among West African HCWs is influenced by sociodemographic factors, vaccine concerns, and accurate information, necessitating health promotion strategies and multisectoral collaboration for improved acceptance.

The primary focus of this research is the evolving landscape of telemedicine policies and practices across various countries, with particular attention to recent initiatives in South Korea. This study is crucial for understanding the implications of institutionalizing telemedicine, especially following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It aims to ensure the delivery of quality medical services through remote healthcare systems. The objectives include analyzing changes in international telemedicine policies post-COVID-19, comparing these changes with South Korea's policies, and identifying best practices for the domestic institutionalization of telemedicine. The research examines telemedicine policies and practices in South Korea, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Japan, and Australia. Key variables analyzed are eligibility for telemedicine, types of diseases treated, telemedicine platforms, drug prescriptions, drug delivery, responsibility for telemedicine, and cost. Data were collected from policy documents, legal frameworks, and pilot project outcomes and were analyzed to identify trends, differences, and potential areas for policy development. Telemedicine policies vary significantly among countries, with different approaches to patient eligibility, disease types treated, platforms used, prescription and delivery of drugs, legal responsibilities, and costs. South Korea's telemedicine policy is in its early stage, recently expanding to include all patients with prior face-to-face treatment within six months. The initial hypotheses that telemedicine policies are rapidly evolving and that there is no one-size-fits-all approach were supported. The findings suggest that telemedicine is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of various medical, legal, and technological aspects. South Korea's approach to telemedicine should be customized to its unique healthcare environment, focusing on patient health and alignment with national healthcare priorities. Future research should explore the development of a comprehensive system for telemedicine that addresses patient needs, provider capabilities, and regulatory requirements, with an emphasis on creating a global benchmark for personalized telemedicine.

Objectives: A recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized trials casts doubt on the effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures in reducing surgical site infection (SSI). This economic analysis is aimed at assessing whether triclosan-coated sutures, compared with uncoated sutures, can reduce costs from a healthcare perspective. Design: This was a model-based economic analysis mainly informed by baseline SSI rates, effect size CIs from a recent meta-analysis of high-quality trials (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09, p=0.29), and country-specific cost data. Setting: This was a worldwide analysis that estimated average cost savings aggregated for high, middle, and low Human Development Index (HDI) countries and country-specific cost savings for the 193 countries on the HDI list. Participants: Participants were patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The analysis was informed by baseline SSI rates from an international cohort study (12 539 patients). Main outcome measures: Results are reported in 2022 US dollars as average cost differences associated with SSI between coated and uncoated sutures. Deterministic sensitivity analyses examined variations in suture cost, hospital stay costs, and effect size, with best and worst-case scenario analyses. Results: SSI-related cost differences per patient ranged from -$466 to $171 in high-HDI, -$23 to $18 in middle-HDI, and -$34 to $22 in low-HDI countries when triclosan-coated sutures were used. The largest potential savings and expenditure occurred in contaminated-dirty wounds. Similar results were observed at the national level in 184 of 193 countries. Best-case to worst-case analyses showed a range of -$533 to $192 in high-HDI, -$57 to $49 in middle-HDI and -$69 to $52 in low-HDI countries. Conclusions: This analysis highlights significant uncertainty regarding cost savings with routine use of triclosan-coated sutures, emphasizing the need for high-quality data and CI-based economic analysis in policy making.

Background: The global push to scale up telemedicine services is challenged by complex, multilevel, multifaceted implementation and a lack of consensus on what the evidence-based essential building blocks of implementation are. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the evidence base supporting telemedicine implementation knowledge tools; identify shared conceptual constructs and outliers; and formulate recommendations to guide the design, development, and optimization of telemedicine services. Methods: We conducted implementation research using a rapid umbrella review, that is, an overview of systematic reviews, in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). In total, we searched 3 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) for studies focusing on telemedicine implementation frameworks, models, and tools, collectively referred to as "knowledge tools." Reviews meeting the operational definition of a systematically undertaken, secondary evidence synthesis, such as systematic and scoping reviews, and those published from January 2018 to May 2024 were considered. A meta-aggregative qualitative analysis was undertaken, comprising inductive thematic synthesis. Results: In total, 18 reviews were selected, encompassing 973 primary studies. Global perspectives were reflected in 61% (n=11) of the reviews, while 33% (n=6) focused on low- and middle-income country contexts. The primary research included in the reviews represented 63 countries, spanning the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia and the Pacific. Findings indicated substantial heterogeneity across the identified telemedicine implementation theories, models, and frameworks. However, following evidence synthesis, considerable convergence was observed, highlighting a state-of-the-art understanding of the essential requirements for a national telemedicine implementation ecosystem. These were categorized into "process" and "thematic" dimensions. Process dimensions included readiness and needs assessment, road map and planning, managing change, implementing telemedicine services, and continuous improvement and measuring performance. Thematic dimensions covered human and sociocultural aspects; organization, operations, management, and leadership; communication and coordination; policy, legal, and financial considerations; clinical health condition and quality of care; and the wider context. Conclusions: The findings of this study inform a pressing translational research knowledge gap in telemedicine implementation, hindering the implementation of high-quality, sustainable, and scalable telemedicine systems. The study contributes to building global consensus on the state of the art of key constructs in telemedicine implementation and recommends that future research focus on field-testing the evidence-based implementation tools to evaluate their usability and adaptability across diverse telemedicine contexts.

Prostate cancer (PCa) poses a significant global health threat, with high incidence and mortality rates. In 2022, the Council of the European Union (EU) updated its screening recommendations, prioritizing PCa screening. This signals a crucial step towards establishing new early detection programmes in EU member states. This study investigates the role of policy makers and governance in cancer screening to inform the development of PCa screening. We had a mixed-method study design. First, a rapid review was conducted on policy making and governance in EU-funded cancer screening initiatives. Second, a focus group discussion reviewed study concepts and methods. Third, a systematic literature review was performed and, fourth, a series of in-depth interviews with actors involved in PCa screening pilots was conducted. Data were analysed thematically and the findings are used to propose 10 recommendations for policy makers. The results of the rapid review and focus group discussion framed the study in the context of existing cancer screening programmes across the EU, and highlighted what already exists in terms of governance tools and methodology. The literature review and in-depth interviews presented key learnings from the literature and real-life settings. These findings are reported using a pre-existing conceptional framework for effective health system governance. The study underscores the critical importance of governance in effective cancer screening programmes. Ten recommendations are proposed, including: defining cancer screening governance, allocating budgets and defining common approaches and key performance indicators for evaluation, establishing methods to enhance citizen participation, and reinforcing network governance.

Context: Organizational leadership is essential for adequate and stable financing, strong governance across jurisdictions and sectors, and a competent public health workforce for effective and resilient public health systems. While there have been some efforts to characterize leadership competencies at the individual level, more focus is needed to understand effective governance of public health organizations and systems through the lens of leadership competencies at the organizational level. Objective: To identify organizational level leadership competencies for effective and equitable public health governance. Design: This scoping review included published academic literature from Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, and ProQuest and grey literature from Google Scholar, Canadian Government websites, Trove, FedSys, and Open Grey, published between 2004 and 2023. The search strategy focused on the concepts of governance, leadership, and pub-lic health organizations. An inductive-deductive approach informed the analysis using reflexive thematic analysis and a framework outlining the six functions of public health governance. Results: A total of 35 records were included for analysis; 22 academic and 13 grey literature records. This review identified 9 themes describing organizational leadership competencies for public health governance: 1) Systems thinking 2) Public policy development, implementation and evaluation, 3) Partnership and collaboration, 4) Equity and justice 5) Organizational learning, 6) Oversight, 7) Resource stewardship, 8) Legal authority, 9) Organizational ethics. Conclusions: This scoping review contributes to our understanding of the leadership competencies needed to enact and sustain effective governance at an organizational level. These identified themes and associated competencies can facilitate the creation of organizational culture and values that align with effective governance tenets in public health. Additional research is needed to further apply and contextualize these competencies in different countries and public health settings.

Background: The historical and cultural importance of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is observable in diverse contexts and among different populations. As the use of TCIM continues to grow globally, policymakers need to acknowledge its importance in healthcare services. Objectives: We conducted a scoping review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research to identify the factors that promote and hinder the adoption of TCIM. Methods: This scoping review involved a comprehensive search of online databases from 2000 to February 2024. The review utilized the methodology suggested by Arksey and O'Malley. Qualitative content analysis was employed to synthesize the data. Findings: From a total of 1403 articles retrieved, 61 full-text articles were chosen for the final analysis. Among these, 47 examined facilitators, 4 addressed barriers, and 10 investigated both barriers and facilitators of using TCIM. Three key themes were recognized concerning barriers to using TCIM services, including "service delivery problems", "governance challenges", and "personal barriers". Six key themes associated with the factors facilitating the use of TCIM services were recognized, which include "financial facilitators", "health conditions", "personal determinants", "perceived benefits", "social impact", and "appropriate service delivery". Conclusions: Exploring the barriers and facilitators of using TCIM services can provide valuable insights to policymakers, enabling them to develop strategies to overcome existing challenges and enhance the support for the growth of these services. This knowledge is essential for making sure that TCIM services are available to people in a safe, prompt, and high-quality way.

Objective: This scoping review investigates the potential of 6G technology in healthcare, particularly in smart city settings, focusing on its enhanced data capabilities, AI's role in healthcare optimization, infrastructure support, interoperability, quality standards, and privacy and security concerns. Patients and methods: The scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework, with Levac et al.'s methodological advancements. The review team searched academic databases like PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Sciences, and IEEE Xplore. They also explored grey literature sources like Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and Web of Science Conference Proceedings. A search strategy was developed, and 145 studies were selected from an initial pool of 9835 records from 2010 to 2025. The review categorized 145 studies into three phases, focusing on deploying 6G technology in healthcare, the infrastructure required, and ethical considerations related to the technology's ethical implications. Result: Phase one focused on advancements like real-time imaging, performing medical procedures remotely, using predictive tools to analyze data, and providing care tailored to individual patients. Phase two examined how the next generation of wireless technology (6G) could interact with communication systems, including techniques to handle large amounts of data (massive MIMO) and using extremely high-frequency signals (terahertz communications) to transfer information faster. Phase three explored ethical concerns about applying 6G technology, such as systems that make decisions based on user intentions (intent-driven management) and organizing information around data-based designs (data-driven architecture). The review highlights how 6G technology could revolutionize patient care and medical services by enabling faster data transfers, reducing delays, increasing system capacity, and incorporating artificial intelligence. Conclusion: The scoping review shows the capability of the transformative potential of 6G technology, particularly in healthcare and urban development, emphasizing its enhanced data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and increased capacity that can significantly improve patient care through better remote monitoring, security, and telemedicine services. It stresses the vital role of policymakers in guiding the development of 6G infrastructure, ensuring effective spectrum allocation, and implementing robust security measures while addressing health and electromagnetic exposure concerns. Policymakers are urged to adopt security-by-design principles, adhere to international standards, and foster collaboration among academia, industry, and government to drive innovation and ensure the responsible deployment of 6G technology. By stimulating research and establishing clear performance metrics, they can facilitate continuous improvement and adaptation, ultimately benefiting society as a whole. The review concludes that strategic policy formulation is essential for maximizing the advantages of 6G technology, leading to more intelligent, productive, and sustainable societal frameworks.

Background: Given trends towards greater life expectancy, there is an increasing need to promote healthy ageing and add quality and value to older adults' lives, however the evidence regarding the effects on overall health and wellbeing has not been synthesised. Active lifestyles may provide diverse health and wellbeing benefits for older adults in terms of maintaining or improving their physical, psychological, and social functions. This systematic review evaluates whether and how different types of interventions within community-based settings could benefit specific aspects of older adults' health and wellbeing. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched in January 2022 for experimental studies (including randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, and quasi-experimental studies) exploring health and wellbeing benefits of community-based activities in older adults. A total of 12,707 sources were identified through database searches with 183 retained for full screening. Final inclusion was based on the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants were generally healthy and predominantly independent community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above; (2) interventions were based in real-world settings, e.g., dance, art and technology classes, etc. held in publicly-accessible facilities; (3) pre-/post-interventions assessed at least one outcome in physical health, psychological wellbeing or social connections; (4) control groups were used, including passive and active control groups or groups that received a different type of intervention; (5) experimental studies followed a quantitative research design. Study quality was systematically assessed, and a comprehensive narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. Results: Of the 183 studies screened, 56 were included in the final review. Among the 33 predominantly physical interventions, 31 demonstrated positive effects. Of the 16 predominantly mental interventions, 14 reported benefits. All seven predominantly social interventions reported positive effects. Discussion: The benefits of real-world interventions were reported across a range of outcomes, particularly in terms of reducing depression or anxiety, or improving physical functioning, sleep quality and social participation. However, heterogeneity in interventions, sample design, duration and dosage suggest that more research is needed to support the effects of duration and dosage of intervention exposure. As real-world interventions more closely resemble the way in which older people engage in activities, evidence of their effectiveness in promoting health and wellbeing should inform preventative healthcare provision and policymaking.

Background: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a crucial tool for evaluating the worth and roles of health technologies, and providing evidence-based guidance for their adoption and use. Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance HTA processes by improving data collection, analysis, and decision-making. This study aims to explore the opportunities and challenges of utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in health technology assessment (HTA), with a specific focus on economic dimensions. By leveraging AI's capabilities, this research examines how innovative tools and methods can optimize economic evaluation frameworks and enhance decision-making processes within the HTA context. Methods: This study adopted Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework and conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. It examined the benefits and challenges of AI integration into HTA, with a focus on economic dimensions. Findings: AI significantly enhances HTA outcomes by driving methodological advancements, improving utility, and fostering healthcare innovation. It enables comprehensive assessments through robust data systems and databases. However, ethical considerations such as biases, transparency, and accountability emphasize the need for deliberate planning and policymaking to ensure responsible integration within the HTA framework. Conclusion: AI applications in HTA have significant potential to enhance health outcomes and decision-making processes. However, the development of robust data management strategies and regulatory frameworks is essential to ensure effective and ethical implementation. Future research should prioritize the establishment of comprehensive frameworks for AI integration, fostering collaboration among stakeholders, and improving data quality and accessibility on an ongoing basis.

Background Organizational Health Literacy (OHL) refers to the extent to which organizations facilitate equitable access, comprehension, and use of health information and services for informed decision-making. Objective This study aimed to (1) review and map existing OHL frameworks and (2) propose an innovative OHL framework that addresses gaps identified in current models. Methods A systematic search of academic (Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE) and grey literature from the past 15 years was conducted to identify OHL frameworks. This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Arksey and O’Malley model. A new OHL intervention framework was developed to address gaps in existing models, based on the principles of preventive medicine and the public health action cycle. Results A total of 19 records were included (10 from academic databases and 9 from grey literature), covering diverse approaches and contexts related to OHL. Four intervention levels were identified: integrating HL into formal education, implementing HL assessments, developing interventions for vulnerable populations, and enhancing accessibility to health resources. The proposed framework emphasizes intersectoral collaboration and communication pathways between education and healthcare sectors, facilitating information exchange to continuously adapt interventions to population needs. Conclusion OHL development requires intersectoral collaboration; however, interoperability between sectors remains unaddressed in existing frameworks. This study proposes an innovative model that fosters sectoral connections toward a shared goal, creating a truly collaborative framework.

Abstract Over the past two decades, private equity investment in health care has increased substantially. Proponents argue that private equity can optimize and improve health services, while critics warn that the business model of these firms is not aligned with the social values of care delivery and has harmful consequences for health systems and patients. It remains unclear to what extent - and how - subnational, national and supranational governments have attempted to regulate this activity. The purpose of this study therefore was to identify examples of implemented and proposed policy options for regulating private equity activity within health care, with the goal of elucidating the policy options available to regulators. We conducted a narrative review to identify proposed or implemented policy instruments in selected high-income countries, grouping them by type using a conceptual framework based on the works of Milton Friedman and Avedis Donabedian. Our search identified several examples of proposed or implemented policy options for addressing private equity activity in the countries under review. Most of these intervention examples fall into the category of disclosure, while only one focused on regulation of outcomes. Our study suggests that while some countries have started to develop policy interventions to directly address the role of private equity in health care, other countries do not specifically regulate private equity activity.

Abstract Background: Contact time in general practice (GP) refers to the duration a physician spends with a patient during an appointment. There are significant differences in contact times across OECD countries, raising questions about the influencing factors and potential consequences of these variations. Objective: To study the determinants and consequences of the length of consultations in GP care. Method: We descriptively investigate differences in average appointment durations in GP care across OECD countries. We then conduct a scoping review of the literature encompassing 150 studies in seven topical clusters. Results: We identify considerable differences in contact times across countries and find evidence for substitution effects between the length of consultations and the number of consultations per year. There is also an association between reimbursement schemes and visit lengths. The review reveals consistent evidence for a few determinants, such as patient characteristics and physician experience, but mixed evidence on the effects of contact time on shared decision-making and health outcomes. The literature is dominated by correlational studies. Conclusion: Descriptive comparisons show shorter contact times are substituted with more frequent visits, and fee-for-service payment systems result in longer contact times compared to capitation systems. For future health policy discussions, it is crucial to clarify which service delivery form is socially desired and economically sustainable.