Background: Olpasiran and pelacarsen are gene-silencing therapies that lower lipoprotein(a). Cardiovascular outcome trials are ongoing. Mendelian randomization studies estimated clinical benefits from lipoprotein(a) lowering. Objective: Our study estimated prices at which olpasiran and pelacarsen, in addition to standard-of-care, would be deemed cost-effective in reducing risk of recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events in the Australian healthcare system. Methods: We developed a decision tree and lifetime Markov model. For olpasiran, participants had CHD and lipoprotein(a) 260 nmol/L at baseline and three-monthly injections, profiled on OCEAN(a) Outcomes trial (NCT05581303). Baseline risks of CHD, costs and utilities were obtained from published sources. Clinical trial data were used to derive reductions in lipoprotein(a) from treatment. Mendelian randomization study data were used to estimate downstream clinical benefits. Annual discounting was 5%. For pelacarsen, participants had CHD and lipoprotein(a) 226 nmol/L at baseline and one-monthly injections, profiled on Lp(a) HORIZON (NCT04023552) trial. Results: Olpasiran in addition to standard-of-care saved 0.87 discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per person. Olpasiran in addition to standard-of-care would be cost-effective at annual prices of AU$1867 (AU$467 per dose) at threshold AU$28,000 per QALY. Pelacarsen would be cost-effective at annual prices of AU$984 (AU$82 per dose). For incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold AU$50,000 per QALY, olpasiran and pelacarsen would be cost-effective at annual prices AU$4207 and AU$2464, respectively. Conclusion: This early health technology assessment model used inclusion criteria from clinical trials. Olpasiran and pelacarsen would be cost-effective if annual treatment prices were AU$1867 and AU$984, respectively, from the Australian healthcare perspective.

Background: Hyperkalemia leads to suboptimal use of evidence-based therapies in patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, we aimed to assess whether new potassium binders are effective and safe to promote medical optimization in patients with HF. Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported outcomes after initiation of Patiromer or Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate (SZC) versus placebo in patients with HF at high risk of hyperkalemia development. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random effects model. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed according to Cochrane recommendations. Results: A total of 1432 patients from 6 RCTs were included, of whom 737 (51.5%) patients received potassium binders. In patients with HF, potassium binders increased the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.28; p = 0.021; I2 = 44%) and reduced the risk of hyperkalemia (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84; p < 0.001; I2 = 46%). The risk of hypokalemia was significantly increased in patients treated with potassium binders (RR 5.61; 95% CI 1.49-21.08; p = 0.011; I2 = 0%). There was no difference between groups in all-cause mortality rates (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.59-2.16; p = 0.721; I2 = 0%) or in adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.60-1.93; p = 0.801; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: The use of new potassium binders Patiromer or SZC in patients with HF at risk for hyperkalemia increased the rates of medical therapy optimization with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors and reduced the incidence of hyperkalemia, at the cost of an increased prevalence of hypokalemia.

Authors' objectives: This health technology assessment evaluates the effectiveness and safety of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for adults with degenerated mitral or tricuspid bioprosthetic valves. It also evaluates the budget impact of publicly funding transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation and the experiences, preferences, and values of people with degenerated mitral or tricuspid bioprosthetic valves.

Background: The delivery of palliative care interventions is not widely integrated in chronic heart failure care as the recognition of palliative care needs is perceived as difficult. Tools may facilitate healthcare professionals to identify patients with palliative care needs in advanced chronic heart failure. Aim: To identify tools to help healthcare professionals recognize palliative care needs in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Design: This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019131896). Evidence of tools' development, evaluation, feasibility, and implementation was sought and described. Data sources: Electronic searches to identify references of tools published until June 2019 were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE. Hand-searching of references and citations was undertaken. Based on the identified tools, a second electronic search until September 2019 was performed to check whether all evidence about these tools in the context of chronic heart failure was included. Results: Nineteen studies described a total of seven tools. The tools varied in purpose, intended user and properties. The tools have been validated to a limited extent in the context of chronic heart failure and palliative care. Different health care professionals applied the tools in various settings at different moments of the care process. Guidance and instruction about how to apply the tool revealed to be relevant but may be not enough for uptake. Spiritual care needs were perceived as difficult to assess. Conclusion: Seven tools were identified which showed different and limited levels of validity in the context of palliative care and chronic heart failure.

Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a cognitive state falling between normal aging and dementia. The relation between alcohol intake and risk of MCI as well as progression to dementia in people with MCI (PDM) remained unclear. Objective To synthesize available evidence and clarify the relation between alcohol intake and risk of MCI as well as PDM. Method We searched electronic databases consisting of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) from inception to October 1, 2019. Prospective studies reporting at least three levels of alcohol exposure were included. Categorical meta-analysis was used for quantitative synthesis of the relation between light, moderate and heavy alcohol intake with risk of MCI and PDM. Restricted cubic spline and fixed-effects dose-response models were used for dose-response analysis. Result Six cohort studies including 4244 individuals were finally included. We observed an unstable linear relation between alcohol intake (drinks/week) and risk of MCI (P linear = 0.0396). It suggested that a one-drink increment per week of alcohol intake was associated with an increased risk of 3.8% for MCI (RR, 1.038; 95% CI 1.002-1.075). Heavy alcohol intake (> 14 drinks/week) was associated with higher risk of PDM (RR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.10-2.82). And we found a nonlinear relation between alcohol intake and risk of PDM. Drinking more than 16 drinks/week (P nonlinear = 0.0038, HR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.00-2.02), or 27.5 g/day (P nonlinear = 0.0047, HR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.00-2.11) would elevate the risk of PDM. Conclusion There was a nonlinear dose-response relation between alcohol intake and risk of PDM. Excessive alcohol intake would elevate the risk of PDM.

Background: Enthusiasts for telehealth extol its potential for supporting heart failure management. But randomised trials have been slow to recruit and produced conflicting findings; real-world roll-out has been slow. We sought to inform policy by making sense of a complex literature on heart failure and its remote management. Methods: Through database searching and citation tracking, we identified 7 systematic reviews of systematic reviews, 32 systematic reviews (including 17 meta-analyses and 8 qualitative reviews); six mega-trials and over 60 additional relevant empirical studies and commentaries. We synthesised these using Boell's hermeneutic methodology for systematic review, which emphasises the quest for understanding. Results: Heart failure is a complex and serious condition with frequent co-morbidity and diverse manifestations including severe tiredness. Patients are often frightened, bewildered, socially isolated and variably able to self-manage. Remote monitoring technologies are many and varied; they create new forms of knowledge and new possibilities for care but require fundamental changes to clinical roles and service models and place substantial burdens on patients, carers and staff. The policy innovation of remote biomarker monitoring enabling timely adjustment of medication, mediated by "activated" patients, is based on a modernist vision of efficient, rational, technology-mediated and guideline-driven ("cold") care. It contrasts with relationship-based ("warm") care valued by some clinicians and by patients who are older, sicker and less technically savvy. Limited uptake of telehealth can be analysed in terms of key tensions: between tidy, "textbook" heart failure and the reality of multiple comorbidities; between basic and intensive telehealth; between activated, well-supported patients and vulnerable, unsupported ones; between "cold" and "warm" telehealth; and between fixed and agile care programmes. Conclusion: The limited adoption of telehealth for heart failure has complex clinical, professional and institutional causes, which are unlikely to be elucidated by adding more randomised trials of technology-on versus technology-off to an already-crowded literature. An alternative approach is proposed, based on naturalistic study designs, application of social and organisational theory, and co-design of new service models based on socio-technical principles. Conventional systematic reviews (whose goal is synthesising data) can be usefully supplemented by hermeneutic reviews (whose goal is deepening understanding).

Objectives Population ageing and the increasing burden of chronic conditions challenge traditional metrics of assessing the efficacy of health care interventions and as a consequence policy and planning. Using chronic heart failure (CHF) as an exemplar this manuscript seeks to describe the importance of patient-reported outcomes to inform policy decisions. Methods The method of an integrative review has been used to identify patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in assessing CHF outcomes. Using the Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions the case for developing a metric to incorporate PROs in policy planning, implementation and evaluation is made. Results In spite of the increasing use of PROs in assessing CHF outcomes, their incorporation in the policy domain is limited. Conclusions Effective policy and planning is of health care services is dependent on the impact on the individual and their families. Epidemiological transitions and evolving treatment paradigms challenge traditional metrics of morbidity and mortality underscoring the importance of assessing PROs.