Antenatal care (ANC) is essential in maternal and child health since it provides care to pregnant women from conception through to labour in order to ensure a safe pregnancy and childbirth. In recent years, mobile health (mHealth) interventions have emerged as a promising solution to improve maternal and child health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth interventions to monitor prenatal care among pregnant women in LMICs. A systematic literature review was conducted using the databases CINHAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in monitoring the antenatal care of pregnant women. The study selection, data extraction of the included articles, and quality appraisal were assessed. Our study included six studies considering 7886 participants. All articles were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Antenatal mothers who used a mobile health intervention were more likely (RR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.07-2.58, I(2) = 98%) to attend ANC check-ups when compared with the women who did not use any mobile health applications or did not receive any short message services. mHealth technologies are being utilised more and more to increase care accessibility and improve maternal and fetal health. Policymakers should prioritise the integration of mHealth interventions into maternal healthcare services in LMICs, ensuring that they are cost- effective, accessible, and sustainable and that healthcare workers are trained to deliver these interventions effectively.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) around the time of pregnancy is a recognized global health problem. Ethnic minorities and immigrant pregnant women experiencing IPV require culturally responsive health services. The aim of this scoping review was to identify aspects of cultural sensitivity in interventions to prevent or reduce IPV among ethnic minorities and immigrant pregnant women in high-income countries. Eight databases were searched in November 2019. Any type of scientific research, quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies regarding interventions against IPV among pregnant women were considered for inclusion. Resnicow et al.'s definition of cultural sensitivity was used to identify aspects of cultural sensitivity. Ten papers relating to nine interventions/studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies, which included randomized controlled trials, a mixed methods study, a program evaluation, and a longitudinal study, were conducted in Australia, Belgium, Norway, and the United States. Aspects of surface cultural sensitivity, including the translation of intervention content into the language of the target group(s) and the involvement of bilingual staff to recruit participants, were identified in eight studies. Deep structure aspects of cultural sensitivity were identified in one study, where the intervention content was pretested among the target group(s). Results that could be related to the culture-sensitive adaptions included successful recruitment of the target population. Three studies were planning to investigate women's experiences of interventions, but no publications were yet available. This scoping review provides evidence that culturally sensitive interventions to reduce or prevent IPV among immigrant pregnant women are limited in number and detail.

INTRODUCTION: Women with physical disabilities experience barriers to accessing patient-centered and accommodative care during the prenatal and childbirth periods. While there is a growing body of work in high-income countries to address these needs, there is little research detailing specific challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where a woman's' burden- and need-is greatest. METHODS: We conducted an integrative review to synthesize the experiences of women with physical disabilities accessing prenatal care and childbirth services in LMICs. Five databases were searched for systematic reviews, retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, narrative literature reviews, as well as other evidence types. We used Ediom's EvidenceEngineâ„¢, a machine-assisted search engine that uses artificial intelligence to conduct this search using pertinent keywords to identify original research published between January 2009 - September 2018. These results were augmented by hand searching of reference lists. Forty articles were identified using this method and 11 retained after duplicates were removed and inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. RESULTS: Four types of experiences are described in these 11 studies: (1) limited physical and material resources; (2) health care worker knowledge, attitudes, and skills; (3) pregnant people's knowledge; and (4) public stigma and ignorance. DISCUSSION: People with physical disabilities face specific challenges during pregnancy and childbirth. Importantly, these findings offer targets for enhanced clinical training for nurses, midwives, traditional birth attendants and public health workers, as well as opportunities for the improved delivery of prenatal care and childbirth services to these vulnerable women.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risks of complications during pregnancy and delivery. The efficacy of probiotics for preventing atopic disease among overweight and obese pregnant women has not been a unified conclusion. Therefore, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of probiotics supplementation for overweight and obese pregnant women. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials from the earliest publication date available to September 23, 2020, regardless of language or publication status. Two reviewers independently extracted data with a standardized form. When disagreements arose, a third investigator was consulted. Data was pooled using the generic inverse variance method and expressed as mean differences and relative risk with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was measured and quantified by I-2 statistic. Results: There were no significant differences between probiotics and placebo on GDM (RR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81-1.30; P = 0.821; I-2 = 38.7%, P = 0.180), excess gestational weight gain (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 -1.06; P = 0.223; I-2 = 91.2%, P = 0.001) and neonatal birth weight (WMD = 28.47; 95% CI, -34.80-91.73; P = 0.383; I-2 = 4.5%, P = 0.381). In addition, probiotics might increase the risk of preeclampsia including superimposed (RR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.03-3.55; P = 0.001; I-2 = 0.0%, P = 0.994). Conclusions: Probiotics had no better efficacy for prevention of atopic disease in overweight or obese pregnant women. In contrast, excessive probiotics supplementation might increase the risk of preeclampsia. More data will be necessary to determine the prevention efficacy of probiotics with consideration of real-world and other epidemiological settings. (C) 2022 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is a gateway to HIV treatment, care and preventive services for pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Despite this, uptake of HIV testing is not optimal among pregnant women in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and it could negatively impact the effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV programs. AIM: To understand the factors that hinder the uptake of HIV testing among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in LMICs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the CINAHL, EMBASE, JSTOR, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases was performed. We limited the search to peer-reviewed qualitative studies including mixed method studies. The titles and abstracts of the retrieved publications were screened for relevance then information was extracted. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2179 citations, out of which 312 full-text articles were reviewed and 22 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We found that a lack of HIV testing kits, poor health infrastructure and shortage of healthcare workers were the main health system-related factors. Poor HIV knowledge, fear of HIV test results, HIV-related stigma and social exclusion negatively influenced pregnant women's decision to be tested for HIV. CONCLUSION: This review has identified that pregnant women faced a wide range of health system, individual, social and lack of women's empowerment related challenges that negatively influenced the uptake of HIV testing among pregnant women in LMICs. Our findings would be useful in developing strategies to overcome barriers that could enhance the uptake of HIV testing among pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: For this meta-analysis, the following databases were searched: MEDLINE Complete, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL Complete, and Google Scholar. Randomized and nonrandomized studies were considered for inclusion if they involved an intervention with the intent of improving medication adherence among pregnant women taking ART in sub-Saharan Africa. Databases were searched from inception to the end of August 2017. The primary outcome assessed was adherence to ART, defined as the proportion of women adherent to treatment in the control and intervention groups. Risk ratios and random effect meta-analysis were undertaken, and heterogeneity was examined with the I(2) statistic. RESULTS: The systematic search of databases yielded a total of 402 articles, of which 19 studies were selected for meta-analysis with a total of 27,974 participants. Nine types of interventions were identified in the 19 studies to improve ART adherence. The test for the subgroup differences showed that there was a statistically significant difference among the 9 subgroups of interventions, chi(2) (8)=102.38; p=0.00001. Collectively, in the meta-analysis, the various intervention types made a significant impact on improving medication adherence. The overall effect estimate with 95% CI was as follows: 1.25 (95% CI=1.03, 1.52, p=0.03). The following risk ratio results for meta-analysis were obtained for the three interventions that showed significant impact on adherence; namely social support and structural support, 1.58 (95% CI=1.36, 1.84, p <0.00001); education, social support and structural support=2.60 (95% CI=1.95, 3.45, p <0.00001); and device reminder=1.13 (95% CI=1.05, 1.20, p=0.0004).The proportion of women who were adherent to ART as a result of the interventions was 59.3% compared with 22.5% in the control groups. CONCLUSION: The use of device reminder, a combination of social support and structural support, and education, social support and structural support has the potential to improve ART adherence during pregnancy. Good quality prospective observational studies and randomized control trials are needed in sub-Saharan Africa to determine the most effective interventions.