A simple method to evaluate (e.g., screen and rank) the performance of coatings that are fully or partially antisoiling (AS) is lacking within the PV industry. Artificial soiling may be used as a rapid and economical assessment approach, offering an efficient alternative to time-intensive, site-specific field testing. In this study, we present an artificial soiling method to replicate the anti-soiling performance rankings of two groups of coated glass samples supplied by two manufacturers (group C with CA, CP, and CS coatings; group A with AC coating). These are compared to field aging in two climates: semi-arid Lemoore, California over 4 months, and the hot desert in Mesa, Arizona over 7 months. Both field and indoor performance ranking utilize the transmittance ratio, defined as the optical transmittance between a coated sample and an uncoated reference in each group, as an evaluation metric to assess the effectiveness of the artificial soiling approach in replicating field soiling. It is critical to mimic the dominant field meteorological conditions associated with soiling-prone days and vulnerable times of day during the soiling season. Our results reveal that the use of artificial soiling for field performance ranking among coatings strongly depends on the soil type (composition and particle distribution), dust surface density, and prevalent environmental factors (wetting saturation by humidity, dew condensation extent, and prior weathering history of the coating). The similar rank order relative to the field suggests that the artificial soiling approach presented may be used for down-selecting anti-soiling coatings prior to prolonged field validation.