The strange case of the two Wootton Reports: what can we learn about the evidence-policy relationship?

Oakley, A (通讯作者),Univ London, Inst Educ, Social Sci Res Unit, London WC1N 1AZ, England.
2012
The contrasting careers of two government-sponsored commissions of inquiry in the late 1960s are the focus of this paper, which examines what can be learnt from them about the impact, or lack of impact, of such bodies on policy making. The Wootton Report on cannabis, published in 1968, had its recommendations rejected by the government that had sponsored it. The Wootton Repo-ton alternatives to prison, published in 1970, resulted in speedy changes to the law, which had the effect of introducing the penalty of community service in Britain for the first time. The paper looks at the short-and long-term impact of the two reports, and at factors that may have accounted for the different receptions they received from politicians and policy makers.
EVIDENCE & POLICY
卷号:8|期号:3|页码:267-283
ISSN:1744-2648|收录类别:SSCI
DOI
10.1332/174426412X654022
来源机构
University of London; University College London; UCL Institute of Education
出版年
2012
语种
英语
WOS学科分类
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
被引频次(WOS)
4
180天使用计数
0
2013以来使用计数
4
被引更新日期
2023-02-20
关联机构
Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre
关键词
policy government commission cannabis comunity service