Stated Preference Research in Reproductive and Maternal Healthcare Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

Erku, D (通讯作者),Griffith Univ, Ctr Appl Hlth Econ, Sch Med, Bldg G05 2-44A,Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia.;Erku, D (通讯作者),Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.;Erku, D (通讯作者),Ctr Res & Engagement Assessment Hlth Technol CREA, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.
2022-5
Background and Objective Understanding the preferred choice of healthcare service attributes for women is important, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa where resources are constrained and improving reproductive and maternal healthcare services is of high importance. The aim of this systematic review was to identify attributes of reproductive and maternal healthcare services in sub-Saharan Africa, and summarise the factors shaping women's preference to access these services. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched from the inception of each database until March 2021 for published studies reporting stated preferences for maternal and reproductive healthcare services in sub-Saharan Africa. Data were extracted using a predefined extraction sheet, and the quality of reporting of included studies was assessed using PREFS and ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research) checklists. The Donabedian's model for quality of healthcare was used to categorise attributes into structure, process and outcome. Results A total of 13 studies (12 discrete choice experiments and one best-worst scaling study) were included. Attributes related to the structure of healthcare services (e.g. availability of technical equipment, medications or diagnostic facilities, having good system conditions) are often included within the studies, and are considered the most important by women. Of the three dimensions of quality of healthcare, the outcome dimension was the least frequently studied across studies. All except one study explored women's preferences and the participants were pregnant women, women aged 18-49 years who had recently given birth and women living with human immunodeficiency virus. The included studies came from five sub-Saharan Africa countries of which Ethiopia and South Africa each contributed three studies. All of the included studies reported on the purpose, findings and significance of the study. However, none of the studies reported on the differences between responders vs non-responders. Nine of the 13 studies employed the ISPOR checklist and reported each item including the research question and the methods for identifying and selecting attributes, and provided the findings in sufficient detail and clarity. Conclusions Aligning maternal healthcare service provision with women's preferences may foster client-oriented services and thereby improve service uptake and better patient outcomes.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH
卷号:15|期号:3|页码:287-306
ISSN:1178-1653|收录类别:SCIE
语种
英语
来源机构
Griffith University; Griffith University; Menzies Health Institute Queensland; Curtin University; Deakin University; University of Toronto; University of Toronto; University Health Network Toronto; University of Queensland; University of Adelaide
被引频次(WOS)
0
被引频次(其他)
0
180天使用计数
0
2013以来使用计数
2
EISSN
1178-1661
出版年
2022-5
DOI
10.1007/s40271-021-00553-9
学科领域
循证公共卫生
关键词
Discrete choice experiment Maternal healthcare services Stated preference Sub-Saharan Africa
WOS学科分类
Health Care Sciences & Services Health Policy & Services