Abstract Background: Despite Australia's universal health insurance scheme, Medicare, out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) for health care comprises 14 % of total health expenditure. People with chronic conditions spend a greater proportion of their incomes on health care than people without a chronic condition. Objective: To review the qualitative literature examining experiences of OOPC of out-of-hospital care by people with chronic conditions and to discuss this in relation to current Australian health policy. Methods: Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the qualitative literature examining OOPC for people with chronic conditions in Australia. Search: Pubmed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and EconLit databases from 1999 to 10th April 2025. Results: 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reduced or lost employment due to ill-health led to income loss, aggravating the financial burden of health management. While many people were able to access bulk-billing general practitioners, challenges in affording upfront and copayments for medical and allied health consultations, and medication costs were reported. Cost was the greatest barrier to accessing dental care. Trade-offs were described between health management and meeting basic living needs, particularly for people who earned too much to qualify for government welfare payments. Conclusion: While Australian health policies effectively reduce the financial burden of health care for many people, distinct challenges exist for groups ineligible for concessional thresholds. Future research to identify the priorities and preferences of people with chronic conditions can further inform policy to improve the equity of health financing in Australia.

Purpose: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience the highest rates of injury-related deaths globally, exacerbated by a lack of robust emergency medical services (EMS). Though fractures contribute substantially to global injury, little is known about prehospital management of extremity fractures in LMICs. Methods: This review included literature published between January 2000 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria pertained to prehospital settings, defined as care rendered prior to hospital presentation, including care provided by lay first responders (LFRs), professional EMS personnel, and traditional bonesetters (TBS). Multiple authors used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess texts meeting inclusion criteria, extracting relevant details for analysis. Results: Of 1251 articles identified, 25 met inclusion criteria. Studies spanned 9 countries across 4 continents, with 14 articles studying care by TBS, 9 by LFRs, and 2 by other prehospital providers. LFR training courses report a combined weighted average pre-/post-course difference of 29.16 percentage points. A total of 67% of included studies report adverse outcomes associated with TBS-managed fractures in the prehospital setting. TBS care is often sought prior to hospital presentation due to sociocultural beliefs, accessibility, and cheaper costs. Few training courses for TBS have been performed, though one course reports a 20.4% increase in fracture management knowledge. Conclusion: In certain resource-limited settings, TBS provide most initial fracture management, which may adversely impact outcomes. Knowledge transfer has been demonstrated during prehospital fracture management courses for LFRs and TBS. Early evidence suggests TBS training and integration into healthcare systems may reduce complication rates, improving long-term outcomes.

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a major impact on nursing and healthcare as well as on research. The aim of this study was to analyse the characteristics of nursing- and SARS-CoV-2-related research in Germany. Methods: A scoping review was conducted. We systematically searched (06/2023) Medline, CINAHL, the German Register of Clinical Trials, abstract books of conferences and conducted a manual literature search. We included empirical studies addressing aspects of nursing and the pandemic and involving German researchers. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Results were analysed descriptively. Results: We included 131 publications (85 quantitative, 27 qualitative, 6 mixed-/multi-methods studies, 12 systematic reviews, 1 discussion paper); 49 % of the studies were published in 2021. First authors were mostly from medicine, psychology and nursing science, last authors from medicine. Most studies were explorative. Most of the quantitative studies used observational designs, only four were experimental. Nurses and other healthcare professionals were the most common target group; people with care needs or relatives were rarely addressed. The most common topics included health, perceived burden, working conditions, and characteristics of care during the pandemic. A quarter of the studies were not externally funded, 32 % did not provide information on funding. The Federal Ministry of Education and Research (21 %) was the most common funding body. Conclusion: Pandemic-related nursing research was published to a limited extent by nursing scientists; clinical nursing research was particularly underrepresented. Dependable funding and the development of a research infrastructure for nursing research are necessary to ensure evidence-based nursing in times of crisis and to generate findings that are relevant to clinical practice and health policy decision-makers.

Background: Telehealth technologies can enhance patients' and their families' access to high-quality resources in home-based palliative care. Nurses are deeply involved in delivering telehealth in home-based palliative care. However, no previous integrative systematic reviews have synthesized evidence on nurses' roles, facilitators, and barriers to implementing nurse-delivered telehealth in home-based palliative care. Objective: This integrative systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the roles of nurses and the multilevel facilitators and barriers to implementing nurse-delivered telehealth in home-based palliative care, which could inform future policy development, research, and clinical practice. Methods: This integrative systematic review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We systematically searched articles published from January 1, 2014, to May 2024 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. We included English-language; peer-reviewed; original; and qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies that centered on nurse-delivered telehealth in home-based palliative care. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess the quality of the included articles. Furthermore, 3 authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the quality of articles. The entities to extract were identified by research questions of interest regardless of the type of study. We applied a convergent synthesis approach to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0, we synthesized the facilitators and barriers to implementing nurse-delivered telehealth in home-based palliative care. Results: This integrative systematic review identified 4819 unique articles, including 34 papers encompassing 29 unique primary research studies. Innovations were mainly delivered by nurses (n=8) and nurse-involved multiprofessional teams (n=18). The roles of nurses in telehealth home-based palliative care involve palliative care nurses, community nurses, nurse coordinators, nurse coaches or nurse navigators, and nurse case managers. Guided by CFIR 2.0, facilitators and barriers to implementing nurse-delivered, telehealth, home-based palliative care were identified to 6 implementation levels and 20 constructs. The key facilitators included the COVID-19 pandemic, cost avoidance to the health care system, engagement of patients and their family caregivers, and so on. The barriers included a lack of reimbursement and payment mechanisms, technical problems, insufficiently trained health care providers, and so on. Conclusions: This integrative systematic review synthesizes evidence on nurses' evolving roles in telehealth home-based palliative care and identifies multilevel facilitators and barriers to nurse-delivered, home-based palliative care implementation. With the empowerment of telehealth technologies, nurses could establish a stronger professional identity and develop leadership in home-based palliative care. Nurses should leverage influence to promote nursing practice, clinical management, and policy support in the implementation of telehealth home-based palliative care. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024541038; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024541038.

Background: Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocols include evidence-based interventions designed to improve patient experience, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes while reducing healthcare-related costs. This is the first update of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care before cesarean delivery after the original publication in 2018. Methods: Interventions were selected based on expert consensus using the Delphi method. An updated literature search was conducted in September 2024 using the Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Targeted searches were performed by a medical librarian to identify relevant articles published since the 2018 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guidelines publication, which evaluated each antenatal and preoperative enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery intervention, focusing on randomized clinical trials and large observational studies (≥800 patients) to maximize search feasibility and relevance. Following a review of the evidence, a consensus was reached regarding the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation for each proposed intervention according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: The 6 recommended enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery interventions are (1) antenatal pathway patient education for scheduled caesarean delivery (evidence low to very low, recommendation strong); (2) multidisciplinary medical and surgical staff education regarding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery support, intervention implementation, and measurement (evidence low, recommendation strong); (3) optimization of the medical care for pregnant patients with comorbid conditions, such as anemia, obesity, hypertension, prepregnancy and gestational diabetes, smoking (tobacco, cannabis, vaping), congenital heart disease, epilepsy, autoimmune disease, and asthma (evidence moderate, recommendation strong); (4) abdominal skin preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated cloth (evening before scheduled cesarean delivery) (evidence moderate; recommendation weak); (5) the duration of preoperative fasting based on the content intake (evidence low, recommendation weak); (6) the use of a preoperative, nonparticulate carbohydrate drink (evidence low-moderate, recommendation strong). Conclusion: The first 3 recommendations are for use in the antenatal period (10-38 weeks of gestation), which allow for the optimization of patient comorbidities, whereas the remaining 3 recommendations are for preoperative interventions (skin preparation, preoperative fasting directives, and preoperative carbohydrate supplementation). Educational tools for cesarean delivery with well-designed shared decision-making focus on comorbidity management should be developed. These management tasks are viewed as routine care; however, the measurable success and impact have clinical variance. The enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery goal for patients who are undergoing a scheduled caesarean delivery is to maximize the quality of the pregnant patient's recovery and the fetal-neonatal outcome.

Introduction: The concept of transition refers to the shift from hospital-based care to home-based palliative care, encompassing the physical, emotional, and logistical adjustments patients and families face. This study aimed to synthesize the experiences of people in palliative situations at home. Methods: A systematic review using thematic synthesis was guided using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) to organize the extracted information. Preparation of the qualitative synthesis followed ENTREQ-Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research recommendations. The literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, ProQuest, and Worldcat, until October 31, 2023, for articles addressing the experiences of people over 18 years of age in a palliative situation at home. Data analysis employed thematic synthesis, involving inductive coding, development of themes, and interpretative synthesis to provide a comprehensive understanding of patient experiences. Results: Of the 441 articles identified, 17 studies were included. Data analysis was guided by Meleis 's Theory of Transitions, and six distinct categories were included in the conditions of the transition (facilitators or inhibitors): "Personal Facilitators," "Community Facilitators," "Social Facilitators," "Personal Inhibitors," "Community Inhibitors," and "Social Inhibitors." Conclusions: Findings indicate that the unique nature of the palliative condition and self-perception requires nursing care adapted to the person's experiences. The data collected and the analysis carried out in this thematic synthesis of the literature collectively contributed to identifying the facilitating and inhibiting factors regarding the complex transition process, considering the Theory of Transitions. The findings highlight the importance of personalized care approaches that address patients' emotional, social, and logistical needs during the transition to home-based palliative care. They underscore the need for enhanced communication, caregiver support, and accessible healthcare resources to improve patient and family experiences, guiding future interventions and policy development in palliative care.

摘要：目的 探讨与敌草快(diquat,DQ)急性中毒患者预后有关的影响因素,为辨别预测效能高、可靠性稳定的预后指标,合理诊疗急性DQ中毒患者提供循证依据.方法 以"敌草快""中毒""危险因素""预后""影响因素"等中文及相应的英文检索词为主题词或自由词,检索中国知网、万方医学网、维普数据库、中国优秀硕士学术论文全文数据库、中国生物医学数据库、PubMed、Embase、Web of science、The Cochrane Library等数据库截至2024年1月1日收录的相关文献,依据纳入排除标准提取数据资料,并评价文献的质量;应用R软件,对急性敌草快中毒患者预后影响因素进行meta分析.结果 初步检索到759篇文献,最终纳入11篇文献,其中英文文献2篇,中文文献9篇,均来自中国,且均为高质量文献.纳入759例急性DQ中毒患者,其中死亡组296例,存活组463例.依据加尔布雷斯图结果、敏感性分析结果,剔...

Introduction: Multimorbidity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased symptom burden and healthcare utilisation, particularly towards the end of life. Despite this, there is no accepted method to identify the point at which individuals with deteriorating health due to long-term conditions are nearing the end of life or might benefit from a palliative care approach - conceptualised as 'Advanced Multimorbidity'. This scoping review explored how Advanced Multimorbidity is described and operationalised within the literature. Methods: Multiple electronic databases and Grey Literature sources were searched following scoping review frameworks. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction. Content analysis was used to examine the different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity. Stakeholder consultations were undertaken with clinicians, academics and public participants. Patient and public involvement was separately integrated throughout this review from conceptualisation, design and reporting. Results: Forty-four different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity were identified from 38 publications. These varied in terms of the clinical conditions and descriptors used. Eighteen descriptions relied on a single indicator to identify Advanced Multimorbidity; 24 used a multidimensional approach. Stakeholder consultations highlighted the need for descriptions that are user-friendly and actionable. Conclusion: The lack of a standardised definition of Advanced Multimorbidity risks variance in clinical and research practice, potentially affecting patient care. A consensus on defining Advanced Multimorbidity would enable better identification of patients who could benefit from a palliative care approach, ensuring more consistent and person-centred care, as well as supporting research and policy development.

Background: White light (conventional) colonoscopy (WLC) is widely used for colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and surveillance but endoscopists may fail to detect adenomas. Our goal was to assess and synthesize overall and subgroup-specific adenoma miss rates (AMR) of WLC in daily practice. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and grey literature on studies evaluating diagnostic WLC accuracy in tandem studies with novel-colonoscopic technologies (NCT) in subjects undergoing screening, diagnostic or surveillance colonoscopy. Information on study design, AMR overall and specific for adenoma size, histology, location, morphology and further outcomes were extracted and reported in standardized evidence tables. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to estimate pooled estimates for AMR with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and to explain heterogeneity. Results: Out of 5,963 identified studies, we included sixteen studies with 4,101 individuals in our meta-analysis. One in three adenomas (34%; 95% CI: 30-38%) was missed by WLC in daily practice individuals. Subgroup analyses showed significant AMR differences by size (36%, adenomas 1-5 mm; 27%, adenomas 6-9 mm; 12%, adenomas ≥ 10 mm), histology (non-advanced: 42%, advanced: 21%), morphology (flat: 50%, polypoid: 27%), but not by location (distal: 36%, proximal: 36%). Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, one in three adenomas could be missed by WLC. This may significantly contribute to interval cancers. Our results should be considered in health technology assessment when interpreting sensitivity of fecal occult blood or other screening tests derived from studies using WLC as "gold standard".

目的：检索、评价并总结终末期肝病病人营养管理的最佳证据，为临床应用提供参考。方法：根据“6S”证据模型，自上而下检索数据库中有关终末期病人术后营养管理的临床决策、指南、专业共识、系统评价和原始研究等证据。由4名研究者对文献的方法学质量进行独立评价，并根据主题提取和汇总证据。结果：共纳入文献23篇，包括指南及专家共识5篇、系统评价及Meta分析6篇，随机对照试验12篇，从多学科营养管理、营养筛查与评估、营养物质推荐量、营养支持与评价、健康教育5个维度汇总30条证据。结论：总结了终末期肝病病人营养管理的最佳证据，建议临床人员结合医疗情境及病人自身情况等制订符合个体化营养管理方案。

Background: Dementia is a group of chronic diseases characterised by cognitive impairment that progressively disrupts daily functioning and requires increasing levels of healthcare, social support, and long-term care. Support for people with dementia can be provided by formal support systems although most of the care process relies upon informal care givers. Despite the availability of formal support systems and healthcare workers, the utilization of dementia care services remains suboptimal. Factors such as non-compliance, lack of awareness, and poor care coordination contribute to this issue. Understanding these barriers is crucial for improving service utilization and alleviating the economic burden on families and national health systems. Methods: This systematic review analysed the literature, published from 2013 to 2023, on barriers in Alzheimer and other dementia healthcare system, conducted on people living with a dementia, their caregivers, or healthcare workers in dementia care settings in Europe, following PRISMA guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science used terms related to Alzheimer's, dementia, and access barriers. Rayyan AI supported full-text review, with quality assessed via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Over 1298 articles, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies highlighted several barriers to dementia care, categorised into information, organizational, cultural, stigma-related, financial, and logistical challenges. Informational and educational barriers included a lack of awareness and knowledge among caregivers. Organizational barriers involved poor care coordination and unclear access procedures. Cultural and stigma-related barriers were linked to societal attitudes towards dementia. Financial barriers were associated with the high costs of care, and logistical barriers included limited availability and accessibility of support services. Conclusions: To enhance the quality of life for individuals living with dementia, it is crucial to address these identified barriers through tailored interventions and management programs. Improving care coordination, communication, and training for healthcare professionals, alongside reducing systemic delays, are essential steps toward more effective dementia care. Easing the burden of care with tailored interventions and management programmes is mandatory to improve the quality of life of persons living with dementia and their families.

Purpose: To perform a scoping review of the literature investigating the use of telemedicine in retinoblastoma (RB) care, as well as its integration into broader health-care systems worldwide. Methods: A comprehensive search of academic databases, Medline and Embase, as well as public, web-based sources, was performed. Article references were also screened for inclusion within the review. Only English-language sources that presented evidence of dedicated frameworks incorporating telemedicine-based RB care were included. Results: The review identified 57 peer-reviewed studies, of which 19 were found potentially eligible for inclusion. Following exclusion criteria and a web-based search, 11 sources referencing 10 telemedicine frameworks, comprising four peer-reviewed articles, and seven publicly available initiatives, were included. Major themes leveraging telemedicine in RB care included knowledge exchange and capacity building, the establishment of direct partnerships incorporating teleconsultation, and the development of care coordination networks. Many telehealth platforms were effectively integrated into health-care systems; however, challenges included the absence of RB specific initiatives, the need for publicly available, measurable peer-reviewed outcomes and the complexities of multidimensional RB care. Conclusion: Tele-efforts have the potential to enhance delivery of RB care to remote, resource-limited communities. Future research should explore improved integration of policy-driven telemedicine within health-care systems, assess the economic feasibility of providing such care, and facilitate empirical evaluations, ultimately leading to increased sustainability, funding and investment of these models.

Background: Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Although clinical practice guidelines for management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy recommend involvement of a general practitioner for ongoing cardiovascular disease preventative care, there are no intervention strategies embedded within primary care aimed at improving risk assessment or management for women after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The study aim was to co-design an intervention to improve implementation of cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management following hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for primary care settings in a local health district in New South Wales, Australia. Method: Using the Integrated Knowledge Translation framework, a series of five co-design meetings with the investigative team and end users were conducted online. Meetings were informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel framework for intervention development and incorporated research findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis, surveys and an online discussion. Data from activities and audio recordings following each meeting were analysed thematically using inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Results were summarized after each meeting, and findings used to inform ongoing intervention development. Results: The 18 end users included women with lived experience of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (n = 8), obstetricians (n = 2), midwives (n = 5) and general practitioners (n = 3). Target priorities were to improve communication between hospital staff and general practitioners following the occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and increase the knowledge of general practitioners and women regarding cardiovascular disease prevention after cardiometabolic pregnancy complications. Part 1 of the intervention is set within the hospital setting and delivered via physical resources to address the communication gap between hospital and primary care providers about the occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Part 2 is delivered via an update to an existing general practice education platform and through resources for use within consultations to provide education for women and general practitioners about cardiovascular disease prevention after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Conclusion: The Integrated Knowledge Translation and Behaviour Change Wheel frameworks aided in the development of a targeted intervention to improve implementation of cardiovascular risk assessment and management for women after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, based on gaps identified in current primary care practice.

Introduction: Advances in therapeutics and healthcare have led to a growing population of individuals living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy making prescribing more challenging. Most prescribing occurs in primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) have expressed interest in comparative feedback on their prescribing performance. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and audit and feedback interventions have shown some impact, but changes are often short-lived. Interactive dashboards, a novel approach integrating CDSS and audit and feedback elements, offer longitudinal updated data outside clinical encounters. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in primary care and examine the characteristics of these dashboards. Methods: This protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023481475) and reported in line with PRISMA-P guidelines. Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature, including trial registries were performed to identify interventional studies (randomised and non-randomised) that assess the effectiveness of interactive dashboards on prescribing related outcomes. The search will be supplemented by searching references of retrieved articles with the use of an automated citation chaser. Identified records will be screened independently by two reviewers and data from eligible studies extracted using a purposely developed data extraction tool. We will narratively summarise the intervention types and those associated with improvements in prescribing outcomes. A quantitative synthesis will be carried out if a sufficient number of homogenous studies are identified. Methodological quality will be assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care risk assessment tool. Discussion: This systematic review will explore the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing related outcome measures in primary care and describe the characteristics of interactive dashboards. This research may inform future intervention development and shape policymaking particularly in the context of ongoing and planned developments in e-prescribing infrastructure.

Background: Diabetes mellitus requires ongoing management and care coordination. The majority of patients with diabetes were managed in primary healthcare settings. Several quality improvement programs have introduced specialist involvement in primary healthcare teams. However, synthesized evidence is needed to support policy improvements regarding the impact of specialist-primary healthcare coordination on glycemic control in diabetes care. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of specialist involvement in primary healthcare teams on glycemic control of patients with diabetes. Methods: A search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CNKI, and Wanfang Database) was conducted to identify relevant studies published until October 21st, 2023. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC (Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care). We conducted the certainty assessment using the GRADE guideline. The outcome measured was the HbA1c level. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Results: A total of 12 studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 5 controlled before-after studies) were included in the meta-analysis. The involvement of specialists in primary healthcare teams was associated with a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c level compared to usual or standard care (mean difference - 0.57, 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.27, I2 = 88.17%). Conclusion: The findings revealed that the interventions might improve the care delivered and patients' health outcomes. However, due to the very low certainty of evidence on the effectiveness on glycemic control, the interventions implemented in the included studies should be employed with caution in future policy-making to achieve improved HbA1c levels. Further research with a more rigorous design is needed to provide evidence of higher certainty and quality. Registration: The systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration No. CRD42022384589 available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced ).

Background: Surgical procedures present intricate challenges within healthcare delivery, often associated with higher risks of adverse events compared with non-surgical contexts. Patient and family engagement (PFE) throughout the perioperative journey is a possibility to enhance care quality, safety and patient-centredness. However, literature addressing PFE across the entirety of the perioperative journey remains sparse. Objective: The current scoping review aims to comprehensively map the existing interventions with PFE approach focused on improving patient safety across various types of surgical procedures throughout the perioperative journey. In addition, the review aims to understand the level and type of PFE approach adopted in this context. Eligibility criteria: Articles published in indexed peer-reviewed journals from 2003 to 2023, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish, that report on interventions with PFE approach targeting adult surgical patients, their families, caregivers, patient advocates and patient champions. The review includes articles reporting on both inpatient and ambulatory surgical patients. Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews framework, this review systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for relevant articles. Eligible interventions were categorised using PFE framework regarding the level of engagement and mapped according to the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030. Results: Out of 765 records initially identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria for data extraction and analysis, of which 40% originated from the USA, followed by the UK (18%) and Canada (12%). 47% of the interventions targeted 'multiple/all types' of procedures, 19% focused on cardiothoracic surgeries and 9% on gynaecological procedures or organ transplant. The majority of the interventions (88%) focused on PFE at the direct care level, predominantly adopting a consultation-based approach. Furthermore, 81% of eligible interventions emphasised patient information and education, 16% addressed codevelopment of policy and 3% of interventions focused on patient advocacy. Conclusion: The findings show a predominant focus on PFE interventions targeting patient safety at the direct care level, particularly in the provision of patient information and education. However, interventions at organisational and policy-making levels are notably scarce. Further investment is required to promote interventions engaging patients and families at broader organisational and policy-making levels.

Background: In response to the significant increase in the global aging population, countries have increasingly prioritized Age-Friendly Primary Health Care (AFPHC) to address the unique needs of older adults. This study aims to develop a comprehensive model for assessing the progress of PHC systems in achieving the goals of an elderly-centered services. Method: A qualitative study design was utilized to develop the progress assessment model for AFPHC initiatives. This process involved a literature review (academic databases and manual search), semi-structured interviews, an expert panel discussion, and the Delphi technique for achieving consensus on the final model. Participants in the semi-structured interviews were selected based on specific inclusion criteria, which required professionals and stakeholders to have a minimum of two years of experience in care for older adults and active involvement in PHC. Additionally, older adults with a university education who had accessed PHC services in Iran at least three times were included. The expert panel was composed of multidisciplinary professionals who met similar criteria, ensuring a diverse and informed perspective. Findings: According to literature review results, 16 main domains and 28 sub-domains were identified. In the next step, through interviews, 7 main domains and 71 indicators were extracted. After summarizing the results of literature reviews, and interviews, and analyzing the results of the Delphi technique, the initial model with 7 main domains, including policymaking and planning processes related to older adults, principles of respect and interaction with older adults, education for older adults, principles of care and provision of services to older adults, access to PHC facilities, physical environment, specialized facilities and equipment, and human resources, was finalized along with the 60 indicators. Conclusion: The developed model for assessing progress of AFPHC Initiatives offers a comprehensive framework by focusing on key domains and indicators tailored to the needs of older adults. This model serves as a practical tool for assessing the progress of AFPHC, facilitating improvements in the quality and accessibility of PHC services for older adults.

目的 整合阴道分娩产妇产后会阴疼痛管理的最佳证据，为临床开展有效会阴疼痛管理提供依据。方法 系统检索临床支持决策系统、国内外指南网站、专业学会或协会网站及相关数据库等，获取阴道分娩产妇产后会阴疼痛管理的相关文献，包括临床决策、证据总结、最佳实践、指南、专家共识、系统评价，检索时限为建库至2023年11月。由2名研究者对文献独立进行质量评价，4名研究者按照标准化提取表格进行证据提取并整合，小组讨论确定最终的最佳证据。结果 纳入20篇文献，其中临床决策3篇，证据总结4篇，指南4篇，专家共识4篇，系统评价5篇。最终从会阴创伤的预防、会阴伤口的缝合、疼痛评估、非药物干预、药物干预、产后健康教育及人员培训7个方面总结了26条证据。结论 总结的阴道分娩产妇产后会阴疼痛的最佳证据较为科学、全面，临床医护人员可结合实际临床情景和患者需求选择证据，制订相关疼痛管理措施，以降低产妇会阴疼痛程度。

目的 总结糖尿病前期人群生活方式管理的最佳证据，为医护人员对糖尿病前期人群生活方式干预提供参考。方法 应用循证护理方法，对国内外循证资源和文献数据库进行检索，对符合质量评价的文献，由2名研究者独立对证据进行提取并总结出最佳证据。结果 最终纳入16篇文献，包括2篇指南、6篇专家共识、6篇系统评价、2篇证据总结。共提炼出生活方式干预目标、体质量管理、饮食管理、运动管理、健康教育、睡眠管理、社会支持、定期随访8个主题共30条证据。结论 本研究总结的最佳证据可为医护人员、患者及家属对糖尿病前期人群生活方式管理提供参考。在证据转化过程中应充分考虑个体的差异性，为目标人群制订个体化的生活干预方案。

Abstract Background: Integrated care attempts to address multiple care needs, but barriers to implementation remain. The service user perspective can guide policy and practice to advance implementation. Objective: To map barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature. Eligible studies were analysed by categorising barriers and facilitators at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the healthcare system. They were further mapped by the components retrieved from the SELFIE framework for integrated care for multimorbidity. Results: Across the 34 included studies, people with multiple care needs identified more barriers and facilitators at the micro level than at the meso and macro levels. Mapped under 'the individual and their environment', social and personal barriers (e.g. socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of social support) hindered integrated care. Mapped under 'service delivery' and 'workforce', a trusting relationship with a key care provider as part of a multidisciplinary care team was identified to facilitate integrated care. Conclusions: Our findings show that 'soft' relational and social factors are critical to integrated care. These 'soft' factors are primarily created at the micro level, but seem actionable at meso and macro levels. The unique perspective of people with multiple care needs suggests that more rigorous involvement of service users at higher levels is needed to inform policymakers and care providers on how to shape enabling conditions for the implementation of integrated care.