DOI
10.1007/s11192-010-0237-1
The Public Value of Nanotechnology
摘要
Science and innovation policy (SIP) is typically justified in terms of public values while SIP program assessments are typically limited to economic terms that imperfectly take into account these values. The study of public values through public value mapping (PVM) lacks widely-accepted methods for systematically identifying value structures within SIP and its public policy processes, especially when there are multiple stakeholder groups. This paper advances the study of public values in SIP using nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) policy by demonstrating that quantitative analysis of value statements can provide a credible and robust basis for policy analysis. We use content analysis of over 1,000 documents with over 100,000 pages from major contributors to the NSE policy discourse to identify and analyze a wide range of public value statements. Data analysis and reduction methods reveal a multifactor structure of public values that has been consistently cited by a range of actors in an NSE research policy network
中文摘要
科学与创新政策（SIP）通常以公共价值观为依据，而SIP项目评估通常仅限于不完全考虑这些价值观的经济术语。通过公共价值映射（PVM）对公共价值的研究缺乏广泛接受的方法来系统地识别SIP及其公共政策过程中的价值结构，尤其是当存在多个利益相关者群体时。本文利用纳米级科学与工程（NSE）政策推进了SIP中公共价值的研究，证明价值陈述的定量分析可以为政策分析提供可信和稳健的基础。我们对来自NSE政策话语主要贡献者的1000多份文件和100000多页的内容进行了分析，以确定和分析广泛的公共价值声明。数据分析和简化方法揭示了公共价值观的多因素结构，这些结构一直被一系列参与者所引用
来源关键词
Nanotechnology
;
Public values
;
Science and technology policy
;
Public policy analysis
来源智库
Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes (United States)
NSTL唯一标识符
JA202305300000028ZX
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
