Fertilizing potential of nitrogen in human excreta across diverse countries and food systems

https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae0cdf
2025-09-29
Environmental Research Letters
Thomas Starck, Fabien Esculier

Human excreta represent a significant but underutilized source of nitrogen (N) for&#xD;agriculture. Few studies have quantified the full fertilizing potential of human excreta&#xD;across national contexts, or under a range of diverse food systems. This study provides&#xD;the first systematic assessment of the potential contribution of N in human excreta to&#xD;current cropland fertilization in a wide range of countries, covering 80% of the global&#xD;population. Using food supply and demographic data, we estimate N in human excreta&#xD;for each country and compare it to current cropland total N inputs, including synthetic&#xD;fertilizers, manure, biological fixation, and atmospheric deposition.&#xD;Assuming a 100% recovery rate of human excreta to estimate an upper-bound&#xD;potential, under the current situation, we find that human excreta (37 MtN at the&#xD;global scale) could provide 15–30% of current cropland N inputs in most countries,&#xD;30–50% in sub-Saharan Africa, and over 50% in major agricultural importers (e.g.&#xD;Japan, Korea, Algeria). In contrast, large agricultural exporters with high external&#xD;inputs, such as Argentina or the United States, show lower potential (5–10%). For the&#xD;whole world, the rate is 20%. For most countries, N excreted by humans is also of the&#xD;same order of magnitude as (and often superior to) livestock manure currently applied&#xD;to croplands.&#xD;In addition to an analysis of the current situation, we assess how improved food&#xD;system efficiency—via more vegetarian diets, reduced losses and increased manure&#xD;recycling thanks to better coupling of husbandry and crop cultivation—could affect&#xD;the potential contribution. Under deeply transformative agro-ecological scenarios, the&#xD;global contribution of human excreta to N fertilization could exceed 30%.&#xD;This work focuses on maximum potentials; future research should focus on realistic&#xD;recovery rates (<100%) and adjust our results accordingly